>>6594698 (pb)
absolutely no comprehension about satire.
now you'll say that about me?
but I don't post suicide images.
being a jerk doesn't make you a traitor.
give us some real sauce of their alledged treason if you have it. My instinct is always to be skeptical about charges of treason.
if you were saying these things about Hillary? would I defend her?
I don't like her.
she did do shit that harms us all.
the problem with these three: they have bad information or they are running a trolling operation.
So bring the sauce. We have all the noodles here (noodle heads).
So much joyless drama threaten death to real people: you got to let go of your hatred and anger.
this tells me that he really didn't know.
he was a dupe.
Remember when POTUS retweeted Jack?
and then we got a post that was very Q like but not Q saying basically 'no, well he's good at some things we use him for that.'
my point if there are any villains, as Q indicates, there were also dupes. Jack was a dupe. He was convinced it was a larp. He was fed bullshit. They played him.
My conjecture.
wipes tears because he was not careful who he followed.
my take. you are free to disagree.
just cause you're a pecker checker doesn't make you a traitor.
they can imagine no narrative where the pople who they accuse are somehow heroic.
they can't imagine that a connected person to the MI community has to do what they do, as directed.
and they just don't love people.
they seem to not love people.
It sucks. I hope you never need to use the item that your state law allows you to use.