So does that imply that the article we studied last night is not credible?
https://www.neonrevolt.com/2019/05/24/operation-charlemagne-the-silent-ones-and-eyepyramid-italys-role-in-framing-trump-spygate-qanon-greatawakening-neonrevolt/
Should we attempt to independently verify the data, which if true would be very important data?
Or does discrediting the person discredit everything they write?
Please advise.
I thought the article was interesting and probably very important. A lot of people called me a shill just for posting it and commenting on it, and I didn't understand why. (I still don't.)
Do we critique information or people, or both?