Defrauding the public with ridiculous bullshit.
So do you think their article alleging the Italian intelligence attempt to frame candidate/POTUS Trump is entirely discredited, or should anons read it and try to discern if it contains grains of truth?
Let's separate that into 2 questions.
-
Do you trust the person/ writer?
-
Do you trust specific information in this article? Do the sauces satisfy you? Do you wonder where NR got them?
https://www.neonrevolt.com/2019/05/24/operation-charlemagne-the-silent-ones-and-eyepyramid-italys-role-in-framing-trump-spygate-qanon-greatawakening-neonrevolt/
I thought the article was mighty interesting but I don't know the person/writer at all, never read their stuff, never followed them, I'm not a twatter at all and I don't get into controversies over personalities either.
Can one separate the information from the person and evaluate them independently? Or not?
I don't like the Ramtha bullshit.
I agree that psyops often mix truths with non-truths to achieve a result, and that the proportion of truth/nontruth can vary over time.
The most effective con jobs are those where the con artist establishes people's trust over a VERY long period of time.
I don't have enough info to judge this person but it seems that a lot of anons have strong feelings against them.
Kek. If I took a puff right now I'd probably fall asleep. Not getting enough rest latelyβ¦
SAM mission type means Special Air Movement. I have no idea what it might be. Courier service? Rapid transit for a VIP or two? Pickup/delivery of codebooks? Something we cannot imagine?
Probably not just flight hours for the pilot.
Then let's change the subject. We have plenty of other stuff to dig, meme, and pray about. I could use some factual-type truth material.
Yes there is.
If you're into custom Javascript this one works. Not my code, but I use it. I'm not going to support you, but if you know what to do you can do it from this hint.
// ββββββ BEGIN SCRIPT
// UserScript
// @name qresearch tweaks by jsanon
// @version 7671
// @grant none
// @include https://8ch.net/qresearch/*
// /UserScript
(function() {
/**
-
Highlight lb/pb links in yellow
*/
var postId = window.location.href.match(/\/(\d+).html/)[1];
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.innerHTML = `
a[href^="/qresearch/res/"]:not([href^="/qresearch/res/${postId}.html"]) {
background: #ffb;
}
`;
document.querySelector('head').appendChild(style);
/**
-
Color user IDs
*/
var opID = document.querySelector('.post.op .poster_id').innerText.trim();
function colorUserIDs() {
Array.from(document.querySelectorAll('span.poster_id:not(.poster_id_colored)'))
.forEach(el ={
var c = el.innerText.trim(); // get hex color code
var rgb = parseInt(c, 16); // convert rrggbb to decimal
var r = (rgb >16) & 0xff; // extract red
var g = (rgb >8) & 0xff; // extract green
var b = (rgb >0) & 0xff; // extract blue
var luma = 0.2126 * r + 0.7152 * g + 0.0722 * b; // perceived brightness
el.style.background = '#' + el.innerText.trim();
if (luma < 128) {
el.style.color = '#fff';
}
el.style.borderRadius = '3px';
el.style.padding = '1px 2px';
el.classList.add('poster_id_colored');
if (c === opID) {
el.innerHTML += ' (OP)';
el.style.fontWeight = 'bold';
}
});
}
colorUserIDs();
setInterval(colorUserIDs, 2000);
})();
// ββββββ END SCRIPT
P.S. I only use the color LB links yellow part, not the Color Userids part which we already have support for in 8ch options.
Is that bad or good? To me, it's just a generic face.