Just got back from a three day hiatus. Has this claim from the New York Times and Washington Examiner made notables yet? They are stating that Brennan's security clearance was never taken away.

"The president announced in August that Brennan's security clearance was being stripped due to "erratic behavior" that disqualified him from having access to sensitive information.

But the White House never followed through with the complicated bureaucratic process of revocation, a source told the New York Times."

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/trump-never-revoked-john-brennans-security-clearance

"President Trump tried somewhat clumsily last year to revoke the security clearance of the former C.I.A. director who played a role in opening the Russia investigation. He then wanted to release classified documents to prove he was the target of a “witch hunt.”

Both attempts petered out, hampered by aides who slow-rolled the president and by Justice Department officials who fought Mr. Trump, warning he was jeopardizing national security."

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/25/us/politics/trump-intelligence-agencies.html

>>6600628

>We'll know when people get fired or not.

Thanks Captain Obvious.

>>6600632

>always let them steal as much chain as they can swim with.

Yeah I get that. But the article was clearly indicating that it was the insubordinate stay behind network who are purposely not following POTUS' order to pull Brennan's sec clearance. If this were POTUS giving Brennan more rope, the NYT or WE would not be spinning it for POTUS by pushing the insubordination narrative.