Anonymous ID: b83849 May 27, 2019, 9:21 a.m. No.6601526   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Global Elites Started The Russia Nonsense.

 

Attorney General William Barr has turned the attention of the Russia probe to its origin. Who started this and why? The answer, as in all the best crime dramas, is probably hiding in plain sight. On July 13, 2016, British academic Dr. Andrew Foxall penned an op-ed in the New York Times, “Why Putin Loves Brexit.” He blamed Russia for the previous month’s Brexit vote, adding in a little noted aside: The United States is so concerned over Moscow’s determination to exploit European disunity that in January, James R. Clapper Jr., the director of national intelligence, began a review of Russia’s clandestine funding of European parties. Bingo! The Obama administration was spying on conservative European political parties. Which means, almost necessarily under the Five Eyes Agreement, foreign agents were returning the favor and spying on the Trump campaign.

 

On August 11, 2018, I wrote: The British aristocracy has a condescending view of the hoi polloi who voted for Brexit, regarding them as easily manipulated Pygmalion-like by smarter people. They assumed Vladimir Putin was somehow playing Professor Henry Higgins to the flower girls who voted to reject the EU, because that’s how they see the world. Among the Cambridge class, this simple prejudice renders Russian collusion a first principle with no need for supporting evidence…. Without supporting evidence to prove their fantastical worldview, the global elite set out to manufacture some.

 

First up was Christopher Steele, who hasn’t set foot in Russia since 2009. He wears as a badge the claim that Putin hates him which, if true, means he has no real Russian sources. Maybe because of that, Steele’s farcical dossier on Trump was not enough for the FBI to open an investigation, and these international men of mystery needed something more. They invited George Papadopoulos to London, used a Maltese asset disguised as a Russian agent – Joseph Mifsud – to feed him a whopper about Hillary Clinton’s emails, then claimed he repeated the lie to Andrew Downer, an Australian diplomat with ties to the Clinton Foundation. That was the final straw that caused lovestruck counterintelligence specialist Peter Strzok to open an FBI investigation into the Trump campaign which he called “Crossfire Hurricane.” Apropos, because when MI6 was joined on its flank by an FBI investigation, it was officially a crossfire: two rogue intelligence services raining fire upon Trump.

 

Conspiracies are mere abstractions unless they do something criminal. The Russian interference fantasy needed a crime. The DNC sold a doozy of an actus reus to the FBI after John Podesta’s negligent disclosure of damaging Clinton campaign emails: Putin did it. Conveniently, the FBI delegated the inspection of the computer servers to CrowdStrike, an insider paid by the DNC. James Comey testified to the Senate Intelligence Committee in January 2017 that CrowdStrike was “a highly respected private company.” What he failed to mention was that a month before his testimony, CrowdStrike had been caught falsely blaming Russia for a hack into a Ukrainian artillery computer app. In other words, at the same time this “highly respected private company” was blaming the Russians for stealing the Clinton campaign’s emails, it was fabricating a different Russian hack to serve Ukrainian misinformation.

 

Why all the fuss about Russia? Liberal elites – who tended to love the Soviet Union – hate present day Russia, which dares to assert nationality and culture against the pieties of the one-world-order crowd. The Patriarch of the Orthodox Church passes on all legislation in the country. Putin put the girl rock band Pussy Riot in prison for desecrating an altar, a crime that has not been punished since the 13th century. President Obama sent gay representatives to the Sochi Olympics on his behalf, in protest.

 

That explains the leftists, but how about Republican elites? Mitch McConnell recently took to the floor of the U.S. Senate to declare the “case closed” on collusion, urging republicans and democrats to unite against Putin’s election interference. That’s a problem. If Trump was a product of KGB-esque intrigue, then Hillary is a victim of meddling. Trump is merely an un-indicted hapless beneficiary. The deplorables are not only racist, stupid losers, they are also Putin’s unwitting stooges. The same non-evidence cited to show collusion, though, undergirds the “but Russia interfered” stupidity. It is a three-legged stool that teetered for a while upon Christopher Steele, Joseph Mifsud, and CrowdStrike, and has now crashed to the ground.

 

https://humanevents.com/2019/05/24/global-elites-started-the-russia-nonsense/

Anonymous ID: b83849 May 27, 2019, 9:44 a.m. No.6601681   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1783 >>1825 >>2060 >>2205

Trump Calls for Changes to Libel Laws After Columnist Attributes Fake Quote to President

 

President Donald Trump called for changes to libel laws after a Time magazine editor admitted to making up a fake quote and attributing it to the president. “[Ian Bremmer] now admits that he MADE UP ‘a completely ludicrous quote,’ attributing it to me. This is what’s going on in the age of Fake News. People think they can say anything and get away with it,” Trump wrote on Twitter. “Really, the libel laws should be changed to hold Fake News Media accountable!”

 

Ian Bremmer, an editor-at-large for Time, published a message on Twitter purporting to quote Trump during his visit to Tokyo. “Kim Jong Un is smarter and would make a better president than Sleepy Joe Biden,” the fake quote stated. Libel laws in the United States apply differently to public figures as opposed to private citizens. For a public figure to win a defamation claim, it is not enough to prove that a statement is false. The public figure also has to prove that the party that made the false claim has malicious intent, a tough legal standard to substantiate in court.

 

Prior to running for president, Trump was involved in a number of defamation lawsuits but never won a case in a public court, according to the Media Law Research Center. Trump’s lone victory in a defamation suit took place in an arbitration case outside the court system. Trump filed his first defamation lawsuit in 1984 against an architecture critic who lambasted Trump’s plan to build the world’s tallest building in New York City. A judge dismissed the case because both the critic and the newspaper, the Chicago Tribune, were exercising protected rights to an opinion.

 

Two decades later, Trump sued a book author who claimed that Trump was a millionaire rather than a billionaire. An appellate court judge ruled that Trump’s attorneys failed to prove that the author was aware his claims were false or that the author published the book with malign intent.

 

In 2003, Trump withdrew a lawsuit against television host Bill Maher. The lawsuit sought $5 million that Maher said he would give to charity if Trump could prove he was not the son of an orangutan. Trump’s lawyers sent Maher a birth certificate, but the comedian never followed through on the promise to donate money to a charity.

 

The fake quote by Bremmer touched on Trump’s approval, in a Twitter message, of Kim Jong Un referring to former Vice President Joe Biden as a “low IQ” person. “I have confidence that Chairman Kim will keep his promise to me, & also smiled when he called Swampman Joe Biden a low IQ individual, & worse. Perhaps that’s sending me a signal?” Trump wrote on Twitter. Biden leads the Democratic field for the party’s nomination for the 2020 presidential election.

 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/trump-calls-for-changes-to-libel-laws-after-columnist-attributes-fake-quote-to-president_2938896.html