>>6605932

that's not what he said and you know it.

you're saying 'exactly' as a verification shill.

the stated reason is that it's too expensive, doesn't work, and we already have a system that does work.

He knows that the work is being used to fund development for some other purpose, and he's not putting up with the patent mongering 'defense development' contract mafia anymore. He never said anything about EMP. Nor did he say what I suggest that it's because of profiettering and patent mongering, but that's my speculation.

The use of Military to develop patented technology to be looted by multinationals is over!

>>6605643

they will extend this to people who spend too much time at 8ch, you watch.

>>6605999

just reviewed your posts and my guess is that you are badgering shills. And what's the point of that?

seriously no point.

you realize that all that kind of crap is there to see who might agree with it?

It's not necessarily black hats, nor is it clear that anyone actually believes any of it.

It's a 'troll'.

It's there to see who will bite. You bit.

so the baker, if that was the baker, gives you a 'GTFO' meme as a way to say 'please don't antagonize the shills'

It makes it suck for many other people when you do.

that's my conjecture. I could be wrong.

think for yourself

don't badger shills unless they are badgering someone else. and even then , think before you knee jerk derision.

>>6606035

That really stupid and let me tell you whY:

I don't agree with this but

if you are into all that freebricklayer thing

you know that really they are what the term

crypto . . . ? ? ?

that it's really . . . . and that many of the founders of that were of the other, so they are the same thing.

Get it?

so you can cross one out and write in the other name and you are saying the same things.

Do you really believe it no matter how it's written?

meme fail.

>>6606079

no, we aren't. you're badgering people and the baker and I don't like it.