Anonymous ID: c368b7 May 27, 2019, 10:05 p.m. No.6606368   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6386

>>6606346

 

FWIW 40% is going to be very hard for many to swallow.

 

Sure, anons will be given 40%

 

However much of that normies believe is debatable.

 

My advice is: Pick your battles. Stick to the truth in the context of your audience. ;)

Anonymous ID: c368b7 May 27, 2019, 10:26 p.m. No.6606499   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6519 >>6524

>>6606386

>I think the 20/80 40/60 info was bullshit - just my gut feeling here

 

I had actually thought about this piece of it after I hit the reply button :) So it's cool you brought it up.

 

At the end of the day it truly doesn't matter how much "inside info" Q actually gives out that pans out that matters.

 

They've told us all flat out at the very beginning that

 

1) this is a mission

2) everything they drop is raw intel.

3) disinfo is required.

 

That is their part in this.

 

The idea of completing the public record with the facts, is for anons. That is our part in this. It's why anons are gaslit to high heaven about it.

 

The intel Q drops can not and will not do that (ie- complete the public record). It's how they are able do it without being arrested. The NSA having complete control.

 

Shadilay!

Anonymous ID: c368b7 May 27, 2019, 10:34 p.m. No.6606541   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6606519

 

The NSA has full AI caps that are able to flag any and all discrepancies. TRump and the top brass would know immediately if anything was unlawful to disclose.

 

That's not counting the AI stuff the NSA stripped from [c_a] either.

 

I love the captcha. Do you?

Anonymous ID: c368b7 May 27, 2019, 11:13 p.m. No.6606712   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6725

>>6606689

> Also, equally, "we" are being used as much as any other.

 

I disagree with this:

 

1) define "we"

2) Anons know they are here to do citizen journalism, because the media was too arrogant to do it correctly. So anons took it over.

3) Disinformation is real and required. Hell a canary too.

4) muh gaslighting.

Anonymous ID: c368b7 May 27, 2019, 11:41 p.m. No.6606836   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6606378

>3) Blamed on a Trump supporter, an InfoWars viewer, a gun owner, NRA member, military veteran,

 

You spelled "3) Blamed on MAGA riot fag from that dastardly q reasarch baord on h8chan!!1 SHUT THEM DOWN!!11"โ€ฆ Wrong.

 

:)

Anonymous ID: c368b7 May 27, 2019, 11:59 p.m. No.6606911   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6606899

 

If I were to hazard a guess it's because once you declare the setting up of it and it goes to the action phase, aside from the chain of command (and who the heads actually are).. everything else will be classified.