>>6606165 (LB)
Oh, so that's your "proof." Sauce his "shady shit," moron. You made the claim, prove it.
While you're at it, I'd suggest you research the phrase "affirmation of the consequent."
If you're capable of understanding what you find.
Never interrupt your enemy while he is making a mistake.
Furthermore, "having it all" and possessing the ability to use it are
not always mutually inclusive concepts.
>Wray is new blockade for Barr. Haspel as well.Trump had to go completely around IC.
Sigh… no, they're not. DiGenova is spreading disinformation. Whether
or not he is doing it knowingly is, well, unknown. The first hint is the notion
that any of these people can legitimately "blockade" Barr. They cannot.
They all work for Trump and he gave an order. It's that simple. The
average normie, particularly leftists, don't understand the distinction.
His direct superior is Barr, and thus that's who he works for.
Spltting hairs over "serves at the pleasure of…" is pedantry.
Well, HE is trying to imply that, and YOU shouldn't believe him. Joe's
job is to do what he's doing. If you watch the patterns of what he's
been spouting, it will be obvious why.
No shit, sherlock. How does that change what I said? It works that with
any job. Your boss's boss is your boss, too. Don't be this obviously
stupid and I won't be forced to continue to pointing it out.
> After his field visits, we never heard anything about it.
That's how it's supposed to work, anon.
>>After the Comey debacle, I would expect at least a few stories regarding clean up of employees.
Which is exactly NOT how it's supposed to work. That's his job,
to stop this shit. End the leaks.
Without context, we don't even know what any % means. There are
literally 10s (if not 100s) of millions of pages of documents, thousands
of witnesses, and connections too numerous to accurately sum up in
the whole mess in any real way.
It pisses you off that I'm right, doesn't it?
Get it into your head: Wray works for Barr. The fact that he also
works for Trump does not change that.
Moron.
>I have never known DiGenova or be wrong or misleading when all the facts are on the table.
What? He hasn't been right about anything. In his defense, he doesn't
have all the facts, but that doesn't seem to stop him from spreading
all sorts of stories that never materialize.
Yet you continue to reply… kind of an idiot.
You're the idiot that split hairs in the first place, not me, then followed
it up by insulting me for callling your stupidity out. Kinda implies you've
got a confidence problem, not me.
What premise was that? Wray works for Barr. That's inarguable.
How do you not understand that?
They all swear an oath to the Constitution and the United States, not the President.
“I, <>, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”
That doesn't have anything to do with who his boss is. Wray is
Barr's subordinate, that's in the law that created his position.
It seems one of the other problems you have is that you don't know
how your government works. Maybe you should learn? Just a
suggestion. Kinda makes you look pretty stupid when you don't
even know these details that are publicly accessible.
For that matter, everybody in the Department of Justice ultimately
reports up the chain to Barr, and they all report up the chain to Trump
as the head of the Executive branch.
You've got all night, I thought? Quitting already? Learn how your
government works, shill.
There's always a report. He's been leaking false information since before
he took office. If it came from the MSM, it's likely bogus. At this point,
it's impossible to know who actually has anything legitimate. Even when
they have general, broad-scope points correct (like DiGenova), it
always seems to be the opposite interpretation when you finally
get the details.
My personal opinion is that Trump had the "resistance" letter written
intentionally to give the left "hope" so that they would push even harder
for their own demise. Just like their assurances that his kids would
be indicted. They probably got actual intel that said the indictments
existed. Then the report came out with the statement "we don't intend
to issue any more indictments" and Schiff et al looked like idiots.
It's called the Overton Window. And yes, I agree.
Note that they (Trump admin, Q, etc.) are coming at it from different angles. People are getting
introduced to the truth on platforms that mean something to them, by people they trust. A great
example is Scott Adams on twatter. He's very anti-Q, but he's pushing ALL of his followers
to MAGA, and every so often he says "Q is nonsense," which he should know only introduces
them to Q. People that normally wouldn't hunt Q down and buy into "conspiracy theories."
Every one of these big names does the same thing… Carpe Donktum, Seb Gorka, all the
weird twatter accounts, etc. The same thing happens on FB, YT, etc.
I've read that he rarely, maybe never, misspelled before running for office.
Just think about what it took to get to the point that Trump could do what
he's doing almost completely through social media. It's mind boggling.
Then put that in the context of "we're watching a movie."
Indeed.
Maybe.
Don't understimate the criminals. They can't be all stupid - they did manage to cow us for
decades if not centuries. Certainly they didn't predict THIS outcome, but maybe their
arrogance is what's keeping them from seeing it through, too.
Dunno… it's strange watching the lunacy unfold.
I'm not sure financial is enough. Don't get me wrong, I'm not doubting
your general message, just that maybe it's even bigger than that. We have
survived some pretty serious financial hard times in our history. I just think
it might take even more.
Like this >>6606520 with emphasis on the "everything."
Excellent points.
Name 3 that he's been right about. That was the first claim…
>and I know that He said 2 weeks for the Comey report, but that was disinfo like C comes before D
And, btw, if you read the rest of my post (and my others) it should be obvious that's what I'm
claiming: he's been spreading disinformation.