Using snowplows to clear tornado debris in Dayton.

"Fake" tweet, but it seems to have happened "somehow" is the feel I was getting LB.

>>6606950

YOU FOUND HIM!!!

It's habbening! Q-194…Rare Pepe!!!

kek

>>6606933

>>6606944

>>6606936

New DJT

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1133284051471687680

>>6607088

And again…same DJT tweet mins later?

post now, inspect after.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1133284566632787969

>>6607105

>>6607088

First version isn't archived

2 mins apart. Identical as far as I can tell.

2nd one at "4:11" EDT (411=info)…but the prior doesn't show up on trumptwitterarchive.com? Weird.

>>6607088

>>6607105

>>6607110

Here are the 4 Qdrops that come up with the 2 timestamps. 409 def related, I'd say, as it refers to Q527 which seems to have applied to yesterday.

So clearly @GlamElegance is a person of interest. She seems like a real peach… a non-traditional "Christian" perhaps.

>>6607121

>>6607133

>>6607110

Well…there's a certain "2" whose dad's 102nd birthday would be tomorrow…maybe no need to "archive" any more. That'd be a "911" kind of blow to them to be discovered for Dallas/JFK and everything since.

>>6607137

Also "Dark to Light" marker on Qclock. You are correct that the Qdrop number and date occasionally/often align.

Ominous CAPTCHA for IC? "Fam [whereabouts] unknown"?

>>6607136

Sorry about that…sort of. I added a "kek". ;)

YouTube has been adding those as a customary bonus feature to us so we know which videos are full of "forbidden truths" that contradict the official narrative YouTube tries to maintain. I consider them a badge of honor if a video gets slapped with one. They're on 911 truth vids, JFK assassination, vids about Protocols of Zion, alternate WWII takes, moon-landing/space stuff.

I'm guessing it has a Streisand effect…and perhaps that's <cough coughwhy it's thare?

>>6607136

It's 720p HD anons…can we ID who's in the reflection?

>>6607136

>>6607189

Doesn't strike me as the kind of person who'd be caught driving a Ford just to save some pennies. Assuming she has many responses automated? Can't imagine many elites sit around and shit-post POTUS replies all day. I'll check out some of those names/accts, but as you said, I'd imagine the right people are aware.

>>6607117

Back to here…double 23's and double 17's.

>exactly the same…

102 or 58?

>timestamp…

age? time machine preservation shit (I prob don't wanna know)?

>Suspended…

now cryogenics come to mind. I'm reminded of my post on this a month+ ago.

>timeline won't update…

body ok, soul/spirit gone?

I know I've gone way weird here, but I think that's what we've been promised.

>>6607238

And I'm not Katie Couric.

free-will, predestination, pre-ordained, wild stuff.

>>6607191

Loving POTUS' new middle initial. Kek #KAG (Kennedy And Geotus)

>>6607270

>>6607271

These timestamps, post numbers and the fact that they are #315 and #316 of the bread…I'm in awe of the math that goes on here. I don't think Jr. is due yet, but boy oh boy these numbers are solid, and a day before 5/29? I'm guessing Jr. appears when the post number and date match…like 7162019, for example…although I haven't run the average daily digit progress…but this could be another reason the CAPTCHA req was initiated…gotta slow it down to make the target.

>>6607303

That date would make sense…and it would sort of be precise in that it's "2 days ahead of schedule" plus the extra 10-day thing…and 12 days pre-20 years is J(1)K(2)…works.

>>6607345

That's how I've often considered it to read.

>>6607392

I think I'm 100% on your level of thinking–clones and all (although that's the one about which I have the most hazy understanding).

And yes, I've got a short list of other "dead" people who I presume to be waiting to do exactly as you've said. Maybe some very recently dead, even. I'll be right on some, wrong on some…maybe right on most/all–wonder how far back it goes.