>>6607800
Scott often posits conjecture merely as a counter example, or an alternative possibility and you must take him in his context and listen to what he says and how he is behaving (in his live feeds) before and after he makes these contriversial statements.
He is really a 'think for yourself' guy and so he does lead you into the forests of alternative conjecture and let you find your way home. He trains you to think for yourself.
Eveyone who says he's bad is just shilling for the idea that 'Q is fake' as a way to put up great big billows of smoke to shake and awe the opposition, who want us divided, so we seem divided.
not only 'care ful who to follow' but also 'know who your friends are'.
but often friends got your back and will help in the safety of your city or town, but in the public forum they don't chum up and 'treat you special' because that's not how good governance works.
for scott and the other ones who some trash, and other also trash but only to divert the opposition from knowing how we really feel . . . he say's
'Who killed Q' not really concluding that Q is bad, but kind-of reporting that some pepole think that Qanon (and Q research) has been vanquished. (or is all that a rouse too).
So not only careful who you follow, but also careful who you trash.
I for one think some of the more obvious targets of derision here are really great allies. And we say 'you . . . bad shill . . . why you here you puss-faced trolling larper who . . . .'
but they are MAGA.
They love POTUS and America.
and they are real.
so they get trashed to protect their effectiveness to provide training and news to good people who still don't know about Q .