Another good question, heard on a podcast/yt vid lately:

"why exactly is racism the worst thing ever, again?"

i mean, sure, on a basic level we know what they mean… or we think we do. they probably do too. but do they/we?

it's something of a "slippery slope" argument, innit?

that if we allow ourselves/anyone to be racist, then they will commit crimes/injustice/(…)?

but why then are those not the focus?

why focus on the feelz, and not the actions?

nevermind that SJW ideology is all about the feelz, and "listening to yourself and you inner emotions" - but hate is wrong. and evil. and dangerous. and not to be tolerated under ANY circumstance. basically, to be hated.

so yeah, hate for hate is the order of the day, but still:

"why exactly is racism the worst thing ever, again?"

>>6608524

>17 billion

ok.

now this money should be enough to fundamentally change the world economy many times over, end poverty/hunger and have some leftover for infrastructures and cupcakes.

now who would bet against the fact that we won't see a damn thing changed

>>6608543

>>6608524

Of course.

But i dream of a world where we don't let them get away with the obvious hypocrisy of it, this time.

It's just too big not to change everything.

And since it won't, it 'should prove it without a doubt.

They can get away with a few millions at a time, but such yugely numbers… leaves no room for doubt.

just like every damn time a disaster strikes Haiti, millions flow… and nothing's changed. this is the same but on a scale orders of magnitude greater

>>6608560

but then if it is only

>bullshit

then

>>6608483

<"why exactly is racism the worst thing ever, again?"

how is an illusion the most dangerous thing ever?

>>6608609

so why, among all other issues we face, is being "subspecist" allegedly the absolute worst?

>>6608684

>>6608536

>>6608726

> those differences are used against us to keep us fighting each other.

so why then is not the focus on the "fighting each other" part?

you know, the actual real and/or alleged crimes committed?

>>6608770

you go on and on about

> hate and division division and hatred

but still no answer on why THAT is the specific problem, what about

< hate and division division and hatred

singles it at the main issue to adress, before even the actual manifestations of their negative consequences

>>6608835

> Their goal: to liberate Western Europe from Nazi tyranny.

how dare they impose their imperialist colonialist patriarchy

>>6608867

but if

> divide and hate

is only a means to an end,

why is the means the main problem?

why focus on the slope and not the end point?

>>6608886

>Not sure what you mean.

yeah you don't get the question.

if

>fighting each other

is the problem, then the problem is the fight.

looks and optics and opinions, however based in truth or not, should rate far below in priorities

>>6608961

>thousands of asylum seekers from Africa

make Wakanda great again

funny how both yuge World Wars were basically colonial powers fighting over africa and now with all the EU huffing it's still basically the same fighing over Africa.

Africans still waiting for people to care, particularly those who claim to

>>6609029

There is no one, single "clock" to rule them all.

Connections help understand how news unlocks/shed new light on past crumbs, is all.

>>6609066

yes, that's one way to do it.

not exclusive

>>6609069

>taking Q and team

No, i'm not putting it on them.

Trying to understand the "enemy".

they say "hate and division" is the worst, because it leads to X.

why then focus on the means?

it's like getting mad at a bank robber for wearing a balaklava, and outlawing balaklavas, and any people who mention balaklavas.

isn't that… besides the point?

>>6609130

>her majesty

not hers to decide how "majestic" she is.

same as automatically granting "honorable" to any public servant, no matter how corrupt, evil and despicable they are.