>>6609271 LB
>WHAT IF: Cardinals won't hang with blue jays because blue jays are assholes?
might be in jest but a good question nonetheless: if "race" and all the "division" it entails is a social construct…
why are animals rayciss?
of course it is.
the real question is "why is it presented as the fundamental, essential question or our time and the absolute worst thing a person can be"?
singers & actors proudly singing how they killed people = fine
someone saying something someone might consider racist = the absolute horror
> it could even be a subcategory of genetics.
>also it might indicate family and lineage.
so why so evil and dangerous?
what's so delicate there?
isn't murder and killing and acts the issue?
EXACTLY, YES
trying to understand this is what this entire slide started from (sorry? not really)
You win
yes yes, fine, you're not wrong but completely strawmanning the issue:
>Pointing out the race of people committing a violent crime (even in an objective, descriptive matter for police, etc) is worse than committing the crime itself in our current Clown World.
another question: so is "being racist" the contemporary equivalent of "living in sin"?
think back a few decades when the social rules for morality were very strong.
anyone could choose to say "fuck it" and do what they want.
free to do as they please, but the community would disapprove, and shun them as outcasts.
how is that not what is happening now with VirtuePolicing?
//
>So?
well, it was never about thought precrimes. or not.
it's about how and why is it scarier for someone in, say, Northern Brittain to talk about child rapists than the acts of the rapists? or those who protected them?
> If someone is racist you cannot "make" them do anything…
then what is the issue?
where is the danger?
> all the "control" we hear from the left is "protect" minorities, "stop antisemitism"….there comes a point in time where each individual on either side has to realize there is only so much one can do….yes we can protect others from the evils of racism and pedos, but we cannot change what someone is or what they really think….
so how are Halloween Costumes a tool of evil again
>Most "racists" choose not to associate with the people they dislike. The Left considers this a worse crime than anything violent.
precisely.
choosing not to associate with the people they dislike
is a fundamental value of SJW faggotry.
deplatforming, fighting "normalizing", "outing nazis", "bashing the fash"…
it's all about excluding a select category of unwanted.
and
yet:
<It is illegal to oppose, violently attack, speak against or discriminate against anyone based on race.
?
> "White Privilege" is the Clown World "original sin."
just a "coincidence" that both are a given from the moment of birth
>Melania was wearing a navy blue knee-length dress with some kind of white and green appliqué on the chest. It could have been a butterfly, but your pooler had a hard time making it out because it was partially covered by her hair. She also had on white stilettos and sunglasses.
and what was Donald wearing?
> ID+ is never necessary
except when bait is good
and endless replies clutter the bred
(always use w caution of course)
…while migrants get to reside at the city of vatican i presume