>>6614062

>Something is telling me that Wray, Coats and Haspel are the blockers and [they] are banking on them to cover it all up.

SMDH. They aren't "blocking" anything. If they were, Trump would fire them.

Wake up, anon, the whole thing is a show for people like you to think there's

chaos where there is none, to think the DS has a chance when it does not.

Until you stop falling for the disinformation, it will continue.

>>6614178

It does for me.

>>6614544

"in order to get a special counsel appointed."

Um, hate to tell Tom, but Trump wanted the SC, and he told us so in his

interview with Lester Holt. That's how you know this whole story w.r.t.

Comey is imaginary. If they have to make up a detail like this, one that's

easily disproved, what else are they inventing out of whole cloth?

>>6614627

Guess you haven't figured out what this means, eh?