What is Learned Helplessness?
Apply this to the Deep State's reigns on power.
Pic related.
https://www.learning-mind.com/learned-helplessness/
Learned Helplessness
American Psychology Association (APA)
https://dictionary.apa.org/learned-helplessness
Pic related
MARTIN E. P. SELIGMAN
LEARNED HELPLESSNESS: A THEORY FOR THE AGE OF PERSONAL CONTROL
LEARNED OPTIMISM
TY Anon.
Many biblical examples.
Think JOB.
Keep in mind that not all of us are JOB.
Some amongst us are less equippped, sometimes by own choice, sometimes by exploitation of weakness, sometimes by circumstances that when changed will change outlook/ behavior.
None of us are DOGS.
God Bless.
TY Anon.
Excellent example.
A trophy that reinforces the spiral to mediocracy is the path to learned helplessness.
It can be unlearned, at great cost, and so that is why is very important to work against, rather than reinforce, the slippery slide into that spiral downward.
President Trump is moar than a great president. He is a fantastic example and has found many other fantastic examples for all of us to emulate. Think Sara Huckabee Sanders. Think FLOTUS. Think Kavanaugh. Think Barr.
Learned perseverance can lead to learned optimism. This is about contingencies and exercising choices. That is how one learns to do rather than be done to.
Can sound simple, yes, but is miraculous. We are social beings. We are composites of body and soul and mind. Each of us sets an example for others. We learn. We teach.
POTUS is a grand teacher. Flawed, surely, and yet such an example to us all in these dark days.
God Bless.
"Brace new world" does not sit well with me.
But this is not the first time that Q has posted to provoke thought and deep decoding. As always, trust but verify.
We are not sheep.
TY Anon.
TY Anon.
Always, trust but verify.
Deciphering is work.
Q provides crumbs.
Not a dictator.
We are not sheep.
God Bless.
Your fellow patriots, fren, need you living.
Know this.
Blessings and prayers, fren.
WWG1WGA
Truly.
Look for the famous phrase, Brave New World, and reconcile with Q's usage.
If everything in Q posts has meaning, then, reconcile with improvement, freedom, sheep no more.
Why fight this Deep State only to embrace a different version of a Deep State?
That, that, that does not sit well with me.
Not about tickles, Anon. Nor fancies.
TY Anon.
Yes, the real world, freed.
Freed to fight for expansion of freedom.
Not a rearguard movement.
TY Anon.
The phrase is famous.
Q used it.
Reconcile.
Sure, you might envisage something different by gutting that phrase of its well-known significance and substituting another meaning. That is not a great way to reconcile. It is like the way the Deep State operates – see spying, spying is not spying, spying. Take care not to fall into the trap of using the opposition's tools and thus accepting the premise.
Example: What does WWG1WGA mean in the context of the Brave New World, as per the phrased borrowed by Q in that post?
What doe sit mean otherwise in the broader context of Q's thousands of posts?
Right. That is the challenge to us: reconcile the meanings disparate. Q posed that challenge.
TY Anon for providing context.
Cynical irony was the tip of the blade.
One example of this form of explanation:
https://www.huxley.net/miranda/shakespeare.html
As with Q, there is the intent of the writer and there is the context in which even that intent can become obscured.
Hence the need for us, Anons who are sheep no more, to reconcile. It is the challenge implicit in the that post which sits in the wider sea of thousands of Q posts.
She spoke it after a storm was conjured by Prospero. Why did he conjure that storm?
Thank you Anons.
That is not a refresher, Anon.
It is context.
Reconcile with the usage of the phrase, Brave New World.
It can be done. Do the work.
All of us have that work set before us by that one Q post in the context of all the Q posts.
Godspeed.
Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson
Published on May 26, 2019
There's been rising tension between the US and China…mainly over trade. But top US officials say the biggest threat from China is spying that ends up costing American taxpayers jobs and billions of dollars. Scott Thuman recently talked to Bill Evanina, Director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center…about China capitalizing on stolen secrets.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PZV0Ym8PWo
Indeed, Anon, just beneath the surface.
Miranda.
Rights.
Treachery known by Prospero.
Unknown by Miranda.
Prospero: 'Tis new to thee.
Levity and gravity.
V. Noice.
POTUS is a disrupting influence. Provocative. Happy warrior, too.
It is this exchange of analysis that makes the Board a great forum for Research. Lifts our game. Heavy lifting made lighter.
TY Anon
Yes, fren, that is the comparison, amongst others, that comes to mind in the wider context of Q posts and this movement.
Think of Miranda and Learned Helplessness.
Prospero's storm brings things unexpected by Prospero. This is why we must be sheep no more regardless of the outcomes. That is the struggle with or without Q. With Q we have the crumbs and insight into the Team that is making things habben methodically. That is invaluable to the awakening, natch.
Godspeed.
The word games.
If the pregnant woman wants her baby to be born, then, the baby is wanted.
But that is not an attribute of the child. Wanted refers to the mother, not the child, in fact.
If that mother suddenly changes her mind and no longer wanted her baby, that baby is as she or he was earlier. No change. The change is attributable to the mother, not the baby.
We understand this post-birth, of course.
Then the mother changes her mind again and wants her baby to be born. The entire time she was pregnant, as fact, and the baby was unchanged, as fact.
The pregnant woman might have waivered back and forth between wanting and not wanting to remain pregnant, to remain her baby's mother, but throughout the baby and the mother lived that pregnancy. This is so whether or not the baby survived.
Hence, yes, the pregnant woman is a mother.
Agreed, fully.
And that would not change if the pregnant woman, or anyone else, did not want that human being to be born. Or changed their mind on the matter.
The child in her earliest stages of development is, in the normal course of things, self-directed toward birth. So much so that the child's existence prompts changes in her environment (within her mother's body) oriented toward birth, not death.
The pregnant woman carries her child in her body; after birth she'd carry the child in her arms. Mother throughout.