>>6617276

>can’t indict sitting president

Mueller really pisses me off using this. It’s a cop out. Barr, in his report before the release of the Mueller report, explicitly stated that he and Rosenstein did NOT rely on that guidance in determining that there was no obstruction.

>>6617357

He did. Or he tried. See my post >>6617407

Everyone wants to harp on Mueller saying he couldn’t indict a sitting President, and completely ignore that Barr said he and RR didn’t consider that guidance.

>>6617661

Another oldie but goodie dedicated to Mr. No Balls Mueller.