Anonymous ID: 581fdf May 29, 2019, 8:16 a.m. No.6617325   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7406

>>6617281

He contrasted Barr. That's about it. I mean, he literally said there was no way they could charge POTUS with a crime anyway. In other words, "This whole thing was a waste of time as I'd never be able to do anything with something even if I did find it."

 

Not to mention that "Russians did it; confirmed."

 

I'll never get that 9 minutes back.

Anonymous ID: 581fdf May 29, 2019, 8:33 a.m. No.6617600   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7656

>>6617351

>>6617207

So, what did Mueller make a point to say? They could not have charged POTUS with anything, and spent 2 years looking for something that wasn't there. Not only that, we know who the source was, and it wasn't the Russians. As this speech was given, we learned that JA is about to die in a hospital in Sweden.

 

So, since Mueller cannot indict a sitting POTUS, even if they had found a crime, then what was the entire point of this shit? To set the stage for impeachment.

Anonymous ID: 581fdf May 29, 2019, 8:43 a.m. No.6617752   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6617625

There are grand juries still going on, and it's confusing because Mueller made the case that they couldn't be in direct relation to POTUS. So, what's all the deliberating about? Russians? That's more laughable than the current Democrat party pool of potentials running for office.