Let's analyze what Mueller said.

"If we could have exonerated President Trump of obstruction we would have done it."

Mueller also could have said, conversely; "If we could have indicted President Trump for obstruction we would have done it."

FACT: The SC did not and does not have the authority to indict or exonerate. The SC gathers evidence and gives it to the AG to make that decision. Similar to the FBI; FBI gathers info but does not indict or exonerate. Info is handed to DOJ to make the decision.

So, both above statements would be true. SC could not exonerate/indict because it's not their job.

So, Mueller is saying, "if it was our job to exonerate the President, we would have done it." Repeat: "if we had the power to exonerate POTUS, we would have done it."

Of course, MSM is gonna spin it to fit their anti-Trump agenda and feed it non-stop to the leftist and normie sheep.

Meme this info; copy/pasta this info and flood twatter, FB, everywhere to get the normies to understand exactly what Mueller said.

>>6618022

>>What xactly did he clean so far?

1. Saudi Arabia and much progress with North Korea

2. Economy and jobs

3. Huge progress on child pornographers, pedos, etc.

4. Weeding out the swamp thru resignations, not running next term, etc.

5. Cleaning up mistreatment of vets and rebuilding depleted military

6. Removing US from terrible trade deals; renegotiating new, better ones.

7. Cleaned out regulations that stifled US growth and economy.

… and many, many more.

>>6618237

Fitton and Judicial Watch is a good bet.

Also, those 2 guys that testified before Congressional committee, (about the Clinton Foundation?). They made it clear this is how they make their money.

>>6618349

I'll disagree with your ambulance chasing label. Those 2 guys are exposing corruption and receiving a percentage of the monies that were ill-gotten and recovered. That's an entirely different concept from ambulance chasing.