See Q post 3344 the other day.
Q post 3344: All about today, mates
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 0f664c No.6572954 📁May 23 2019 21:11:35 (EST)
Anonymous ID: 27715b No.6572883 📁May 23 2019 21:09:11 (EST)
Q,
what about the Comey report?
Moves & countermoves.
Misdirection sometimes creates one person to turn on another (publicly).
[C]oming soon.
Q
We should have moved on to another stage by now.
If we are the new news, we should have something in the Internet that we could contribute to - as QNN - that is safe, reliable, backed up by NSA and fit for public, normie consumption. They are not getting any of this.
We look stoopider every day.
A real research effort, to collate all our efforts on all the topics, is needed too. That would lead to reputable summaries that we could all use with normies. But it would require hands-on leadership. Q's posts and 8chan are not serving that function.
QRes is still the only worthy news source. But this is going on way too long, with way too many glitches.
I can't help thinking the hammer should have come down last summer. Something altered last spring.
We'll never know. I understand their rationale for optics and legalities. But a honestly question whether they really appreciate the depth of hatred for conservatives and POTUS. They must, but they exist in a military bubble, too.
Those of us in the IRL see things very differently.
Of course we want to avoid bloodshed. And conservatives could have done considerably more the last 50 years, too.
Building empires, golf courses, etc. How about real schools, news orgs, fine arts?
At this point, Q+ has got to realize that we do still trust the Plan (whatever the hell that actually is) but we need a little more than occasional rah-rahs.
Q said long ago, post 918, 3/10/18:
>>613796
You are learning.
How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible?
Wait until you learn who has been talking to you here.
Q
Now, I thought then that we'd eventually know who they are. Now I don't believe we will.
For POTUS to do nothing more than air-Q, and that's rather childish, tells me someone here is out of the loop.