Question for lawfag… Does discovery work the same in an impeachment case as a civil or criminal case?

Both sides may introduce evidence to support the truth of their respective

claims and evidence to cast doubt on the evidence of the other side. �For

the most part, each side must disclose to the other evidence in the first

category but not evidence in the second. �If the only purpose of some

evidence is to cast doubt on the other side's case, it does not have to be

disclosed beforehand.

Would that mean evidence proving fuckery could be hidden until used in defense of BS impeachment charges?

Question for lawfag… Does discovery work the same in an impeachment case as a civil or criminal case?

Both sides may introduce evidence to support the truth of their respective

claims and evidence to cast doubt on the evidence of the other side. �For

the most part, each side must disclose to the other evidence in the first

category but not evidence in the second. �If the only purpose of some

evidence is to cast doubt on the other side's case, it does not have to be

disclosed beforehand.

Would that mean evidence proving fuckery could be hidden until used in defense of BS impeachment charges?>>6621869

>>6621869

We agree POTUS doesn't need discovery, he does need an unfiltered audience and a way to show the evidence spin free, like on a live CourtTV impeachment extravaganza