>>6621626

admitting to lying to all of us doesn't make you seem any more credible than 8bit if he did what you say.

You think playing God and telling us a lie about why he stepped down somehow works in your favor?

You could have at least apologized. His stepping down was questioned for days and many said they didn't believe the story.

You comped the board every bit as much as he did by lying to us.

Come clean with everything and in the future I would appreciate if you not make decisions for me about what info I should have for my own good

>>6621804

Q migrated us once after the board was comped. This board is comped no matter how you look at it.

*bit may or may not have done anything wrong but BO/BV admit to lying to all of us so we know they did do something wrong.

I will wait for Q to migrate us or say goodbye if Q agrees this place is comped

>>6621928

It was Strzok. They didn't make it easy to find but bottom line is…. Strzok was DAD for a short time. He accepted the tickets from MSM and leaked

>>6622025

No the Mueller bullet was used because declas is coming in days and people are wise to their FF.

They didn't know if Coats and Wray were still stalling and Meadows said days. Mueller is supposed to act as narrative hijack during the release of declas as well as an excuse after declas to claim declas is retaliation for impeachment efforts

If 8bit had to step down because of chasing female baker pussy, then why did anyone allow a female baker to call herself out as female? Why did any of you keep her after she violated TOGTFO rule? Why is there 2 sets of standards for females here? Why do all females get flooded with tits or get the fuck out if they say or suggest a female perspective while 1 baker was allowed to corrupt this entire board? Are the rest of you just jealous that you couldn't get in her pants? If 8bit chased her, the rest of you left our door open!