>>6622790
> when there's no baker to help maintain focus.
and there my dear anon you hit upon the very essence of why we need bakers
the editorial discretion to modify the dough, to pick titles and collect and post notables is something that either contributes or detracts from the purpose here.
I remember one who spoke of it as psychological momentum
By their fruits ye shall know them
but if you can't tell one from another you only know that some are better than others but no way to tell which is which.
>>6622791
>the shillBO thinks 80% of bakers are shills.
I believe there are and have been a few subversive bakers among the newbies and actual dedicated genuine patriotic volunteers known as bakers.
But I do not believe for an instant that the average level of real bakers to those who bake with an agenda has ever been that high.
I could be wrong tho…