>>662468
I'd read all your posts. Was responding to ID 2d5ce4 that included one of my posts in the Shilldler's List. I could have summed it up as an echo chamber resistant to counterarguments. Instead just cited "critical questioning of events vs. promises"
Not clear on comment of:
>>662121 (LB)
>As drugs are the principle tool the cabal is using to weaken and corrupt people and institutions world wide, exposing widespread approval of the populace for real Draconian measures against them is a non starter.
Confused. Can anyone explain what is meant by this statement?