>>6625345 lb
baker
first of all no explanation was given. secondly i don't see any correlation to anything. not trying to be a dick to you baker, just see some suspect shit in the notables. hope you are checking. maybe an anon can chime in and give an explanation. otherwise i say remove it. just my two cents.
there are two that just dont make sense and have no description. also dont see where anons nominated them…
>>6625787more eyes always a good thing when trying to find the truth.