Anonymous ID: 444b6b May 30, 2019, 6:08 a.m. No.6626689   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6691 >>6748 >>6894 >>6996

Alan Dershowitz: Shame on Robert Mueller

 

Today Robert Mueller delivered a very vague address that stirred up the fake news media famous lawyer Alan Dershowitz had strong words for Mueller.

 

He penned a letter for the Hill:

 

“The statement by special counsel Robert Mueller in a Wednesday press conference that “if we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime we would have said that” is worse than the statement made by then FBI Director James Comey regarding Hillary Clinton during the 2016 presidential campaign. Comey declared in a July 2016 press conference that “although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive highly classified information.”

 

Comey was universally criticized for going beyond his responsibility to state whether there was sufficient evidence to indict Clinton. Mueller, however, did even more. He went beyond the conclusion of his report and gave a political gift to Democrats in Congress who are seeking to institute impeachment proceedings against President Trump. By implying that President Trump might have committed obstruction of justice, Mueller effectively invited Democrats to institute impeachment proceedings. Obstruction of justice is a “high crime and misdemeanor” which, under the Constitution, authorizes impeachment and removal of the president.

 

Until today, I have defended Mueller against the accusations that he is a partisan. I did not believe that he personally favored either the Democrats or the Republicans, or had a point of view on whether President Trump should be impeached. But I have now changed my mind. By putting his thumb, indeed his elbow, on the scale of justice in favor of impeachment based on obstruction of justice, Mueller has revealed his partisan bias. He also has distorted the critical role of a prosecutor in our justice system.

 

Virtually everybody agrees that, in the normal case, a prosecutor should never go beyond publicly disclosing that there is insufficient evidence to indict. No responsible prosecutor should ever suggest that the subject of his investigation might indeed be guilty even if there was insufficient evidence or other reasons not to indict. Supporters of Mueller will argue that this is not an ordinary case, that he is not an ordinary prosecutor, and that President Trump is not an ordinary subject of an investigation. They are wrong. The rules should not be any different.

Alan Dershowitz

Anonymous ID: 444b6b May 30, 2019, 6:18 a.m. No.6626727   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Judicial Watch

🔎

‏Verified account @JudicialWatch

16m16 minutes ago

 

Federal agents captured 141 illegal immigrants in just a few weeks by using fingerprints from local DUI arrests in New England which is well known for protecting illegal aliens from fed authorities by offering sanctuary through local policies. http://jwatch.us/pEXRtq