Anonymous ID: 4bb64c May 30, 2019, 6:20 a.m. No.6626729   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6626714

Bombard NO !!

You keep coming back here when I tell you you're not welcome.

You're an imbecile and con-artist.

You couldn't read the emotions of a smileyface on your iphone. So stop trying the big guys.

 

Defenders of childkilling pedovores are not, and will never be, welcome here.

Like Ricky Dearmanโ€ฆ Whom you so deceptively defended while he was laughing at you.

 

Bad Bombard. Bad. Go sit in your basket ! You've been a bad dog.

Anonymous ID: 4bb64c May 30, 2019, 6:38 a.m. No.6626800   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6809 >>6817 >>6863

>>6626776

>not endorsements.

No, but enemy messages.

 

>>6626780

Was going to anyways. So that suits me fine.

 

I study bodylanguage on a hobbyist basis. I'm by no means an expert. But I do know some.

Anywho.

You've heard about the Hampstead Case? You know the 2 kids descibing very detailed how their dad helped them decapitate babies.

Bombard "took on" Ricky Dearman, the dad.

 

You just look at this and tell me that you agree with her assessment.

You don't have to be an expert to see that he's lying. And I can point to many areas where she outright misses important and obvious clues.

Like his constant contempt smile.

Anonymous ID: 4bb64c May 30, 2019, 6:46 a.m. No.6626842   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6851

>>6626817

>>6626824

>>bombard is full of shit

>and boring to boot

If she was honest I wouldnt find her boring.

This is a field that interests me very much. Which is also why I object this harshly.

To see something I love being misrepresented this badly almost hurts, especially when I see people just buy it.

Anonymous ID: 4bb64c May 30, 2019, 6:56 a.m. No.6626888   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6896

>>6626851

I did. About 1000-2000 breads ago.

I should have saved that. But you're welcome to dig.

I know this sounds like a cop-out, and if that is how you take it then so be it.

But I really am not in the mood to go through an entire 25 minute video, in segments, again, right now.

I will however do it later today. When i've gotten some sleep. And save it this time, so i'll have it at the ready.

But I honestly thought seeing that was enough.

 

>>6626863

I stopped watching these talking heads a few years ago, infact I think the Dearman one was the one that made me quit.

But, if she is still around, TheDialogue did a pretty good analysis of dearman.

But I can't otherwise really recommend anyone.

>now you have ruined her for me.

I'm sorry about that Anon.

Anonymous ID: 4bb64c May 30, 2019, 7:01 a.m. No.6626919   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6626896

>bulletpoints on why you kvetch, at least

I told you about the contemt smile that she fails to mention. But fair.

Give me ~ 30 minutes and I'll provide some quick bulletpoints. But nothing to the point of actual analysis.