> I will take it out since you have objected and no one nominated it in the first place anyway.
wut
that's weak reasoning.
fucking notablepolice having no trust in anon's discernment sucks
> I will take it out since you have objected and no one nominated it in the first place anyway.
wut
that's weak reasoning.
fucking notablepolice having no trust in anon's discernment sucks
>going to omit it just coz some shill cunt uses it
dat's some lovely SJW logic, just like discarding OK sign (and current hashtag battle)
> but they didn't. i wonder why…
but then they couldn't wait for an opportune moment
to get rid of "problematic" materials
while smearing enemies
then ADD to information instead of substracting.
make a proper post explaining how she's wrong and lobby to have that ADDED TO the previous notable.
much better than censorship/erasing/notablepolicing
>1000-2000 breads ago.
well that's ancient history…
you get the point: whining is useless, offer better - or bulletpoints on why you kvetch, at least