can't keep eyes always on, but thanks for the effort.
as i said, i don't expect an in-depth analysis, especially not every time, but a flat-out rejection without anything to back it is a liddle too naked.
but mostly i objected to the baker bullying.
not the proper way
>assault on the rule of law and the foundations of our democracy
notice they didn't say that when they got some minor wins in 2018.
it's only DEMOCRACY IN PERIL when they lose
<Centuries!
ohwell, too bad we've got less than 12 years to live, eh?
or have the goalposts moved again
>pledging to give their Electoral College votes to the presidential candidate who wins the national popular vote
wait til they see how that can boomerang
what about the Chiasso bonds/incident
> They denied it ever took place
yeah… long after reporting about it.
sadly MSM/normieworld/FantasyLand is an 84 hellscape where they can just re-write history.
the whole thing is so weird. it just wouldn't make sense for the forgers they claimed did this to create fakes like this… just beyond too yuge numbers.
it's always stuck with me…
#NeverForget
< I am an tit Rump
>Those were real
yeah, everything points to that…
whatever they were exactly.
>agree on forgery as who the hell could you sell them to? Whoever would buy them would surely do the due diligence.
the spoopyness, the numbers. to me it screams state actors, but then again we know the actual real dark markets are so yuge, who knows…
but the whole event was a rare peek behind the curtain.
at the time my conclusion was pretty much that the bonds are very real - only, they always throw in one or two sketchy ones in there, with the dumbest, stupidest mistakes and typos possible, so when caught they can just point to those and avoid ever paying them back.
but that by itself demonstrates a scam: if a crime syndicate is so powerful and bold it creates forgeries in the HUNDREDS OF TRILLIONS, they would be dumb enough to have stupid typos? don't seem right at all.
why should we give any fucks about that wankster youtuber
>Thats not how we do shit here.
yeah…. then last night they sorta said they were sorta sorry.
but not much in explanations/changes regarding their sketchy actions.
a whole lotta he said/they said, basically
>A page called “Purchases” shows an accurate list of many — though not all — of the things I’ve bought dating back to at least 2012. I made these purchases using online services or apps such as Amazon, DoorDash or Seamless, or in stores such as Macy’s, but never directly through Google.
uuuuugh
who the fuck is surprised?
just like the "smart" TVs….
what the fuck else is a panopticon digital infrastructure supposed to be built - and used - for?