Anonymous ID: 2d6334 May 30, 2019, 11:48 a.m. No.6629041   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9067 >>9084

>>6629020

>>6628593

1st and 10, at the 40, could've very well meant, our own 40…with the 50 coming up next, if we can get the first down. Looks like Act 1 is over = the 1st Act is down. Now we are at the 50…which is a BORDER…ourside vs their side. Big Statement today expected about the BORDER.

 

Seems like this no huddle offense is working just fine and the ball is progressing down the field as planned. Stick with the fundamentals and this drive will score.

Anonymous ID: 2d6334 May 30, 2019, 12:02 p.m. No.6629164   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9298

>>6629110

>https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/05/30/book-joe-biden-1973-lectured-cleveland-what-good-negro/

 

I do not buy the concept, popular in the ’60s, which said, “We have suppressed the black man for 300 years and the white man is now far ahead in the race for everything our society offers. In order to even the score, we must now give the black man a head start, or even hold the white man back, to even the race. I don’t buy that,” Biden told a Delaware weekly newspaper in 1975. “I don’t feel responsible for the sins of my father and grandfather.I feel responsible for what the situation is today, for the sins of my own generation. And I’ll be damned if I feel responsible to pay for what happened 300 years ago.”

 

In the next paragraph, Grim cites Biden’s speech in 1973 to the City Club in Cleveland, where the then-newly elected senator opined about what he thought is “good for the Negro.”

 

“In 1973, during a speech at the City Club in Cleveland, Biden told an audience that the Nixon-era resurgence of Republicans in the South was a good thing,” Grim writes:

 

“I think the two-party system,” he said, “although my Democratic colleagues won’t like my saying this, is good for the South and good for the Negro, good for the black in the South. Other than the fact that [southern Senators] still call me boy, I think they’ve changed their mind a little bit.”