>>6630303
For your consideration....will repost periodically today.
Anons and Bakers
Please be aware that there is some evidence that shills are working alone or in teams to create false notables that look real and then criticizing bakers who do not include them. Or if they do, shills later attack for a false notable, calling out the "shill baker." Sometimes anons will make positive statements but don't use the word "notable," so a shill can later come back and say it was not "nominated." Other times, it IS nominated (by shills) but if baker falls for it, they will say baker is stupid (or a shill) for falling for these tactics (maybe the same shill who nominated it).
Case in point; Don Jr wearing a MAGA t shirt. There was a hard push to get me to include it and I would not (too easy to fake). So they tried at start of NB:
>>6625496, >>6628631
but I wouldn't bite.
Tried again with the next baker, this time successfully:
>>6626664, >>6626747 Trump JR in a MAGA, Punisher Skull [PAIN] shirt (also with "3%" militia logo)
Still think it's fake. If so, not the baker's fault, these guys are slick. May be one guy with multiple IPs. Probably one or two anons in there, too, easy to get sucked in.
Another post I DID include (it was an end of bread post):
>>6625345 New USAF tweet; anon ties to q posts
At least one person didn't like it, but look at how they asked baker about it:
>>6625662
My response:
>>6625700
Anons replies--note the ref to "suspect shit in the notables":
>>6625713
When asked about that, he didn't respond
>>6625742
FF to two breads later: same objection again but now there were moar anons present who blew him off:
>>6626296
>>6626519
Other examples:
>>6626030 some 4channers talking about "big happenings" on July 4 (not notabled PB, but NB, there was clamouring for notable): >>6626290 , which anons rejected, so end of story. >>6626293
Pic of a boyscout jamboree that someone hoped baker would see as a POTUS rally (because why else include it?). He was successful:
>>6626018
until another anon traced the pic:
>>6626177
---------------------------
Suggestions:
-
Bakers, be especially carefully right now when including ANYTHING that doesn't come pre-sauced (from a published source), even when nommed Notable.
-
Anons, plz call out suspicious-looking posts, espec. when posters seem to clamor for or against it being notable
* Remember that Notables are not Endorsements (so no need to cry "shill baker" over notables that are not easy to evaluate on the fly)