>>6631063 pb

I was just reading about a (secretive:/) ? meeting in North Africa at the end of WW2 wherein Roosevelt, de Gaulle and Churchill all met privately. Casablanca Conference, Jan. '43. I wonder if they discussed this agreement there?

It was said there was concern people would would feel France and England conspired against Russia, when Stalin did not show up. I guess they did?

>>6631556 pb

In archaic English language, "Nice" also refereed to "fool" "foolish" ' "silly" "ignorant" "rude" Chaucer.

>>6631353 pb

I don't remember exactly how invite arrived. It was pushed; either through Q related group on FB or from Twitter. I think it was FB.

The platform seemed insecure.

DISCORD? even the name is unappealing?

>>6631823

well, Anti-communists were controlled by fascist / Deep Stater-s" Much as Tea Party was co-opted

cf "Paper Clip"

I wouldn't be surprised if both Mueller and "Rosenstein" were products of the "Paper clip" project.

Deep State "elite' covered what they were doing with "anti - Communism'

I think all this is pointed to in "The Plan" video?

>>6631702

So they claim. muh Yahoo.

Yahoo? That's like Snopes?

Maybe Notable is you say

Yahoo claims Kim Jong Un carries out purge, yet no confirmation?

>>6631702

Maybe Kim is firing the C-A?!

>>6632275

Why do you care?

>>6632280

"declination" shouldn't that be "refusal?"

>>6627506 pb

Who's the actor with the moustache? Could that be Jack Parsons, after he moved to Hollywood?

>>6632002 pb

PAPER BALLOTs, that's it.