>>6631675

baker notable

>>6631767 Dig worthy

>>6631801

If somebody has the energy to watch the video and transcribe just the tail number, then planefags can look up plane ownership and other details, which might give a clue as to its activities. We can also look up historic flight records to see where it has been.

>>6631785

>>6631767

>>6631863

I just don't do fucking videos.

Other stuff, I will do.

Allergic to videos.

>>6631900

Or else Kim is ensuring that these kinds of stories reach the MSM as he continues to play his role in the movie.

>>6632081

Not a lawfag but I think it's real simple, anon.

There are pending criminal cases.

Some are before grand juries.

Some may actually be in trial.

Others are sealed and the indictments have not yet been revealed to the defendants.

It is very important that these cases be allowed to proceed without anything that could be used as a defense by the defendants, such as premature public exposure of the details.

Barr is in the best position to ensure a proper interlock with the pending cases so that some material can be declassed right away and some might have to wait until those prosecutions are further along.

I've said this many times.

Anybody agree/disagree?

It just seems to logical to me.

"I can't get a fair trial because there are no jury members that haven't heard my case on the news" is a common defense that gets some criminals off the hook. We can't let this happen. These may be some of the most important cases in American history.

>>6632207

>>6632260

Thanks for the news articles, pirate.

Always an interesting selection.

baker notable

>>6632280 Rep Doug Collins letter to AG Barr concerned over non-prosecution of FBI leakers

>>6632321

Ever heard of the fair use doctrine?

So long as we are discussing, not publishing, the articles, or posting only in part or summary, should be OK I believe.

>>6632337

It's a legal term.

It's the noun corresponding to "decline".