>>6633187 lb

See, I need to redefine "soon" cuz it sure is a different time frame that what I am use to it meaning, kek.

> they do not even realize it.

not everyone is in that boat. Not as many as you would think based on what you see here. I get your indifference. The frustration of not having much control or a voice is tough. But, I think you know, you are listened to by the overlords. That's much moar than a nobody like me gets. There's got to be a better way than just not giving a fuck about our life and liberty.

>>6633915

>It's all possible anon

It's only possible if you don't believe Q. He has been very clear on Mueller. Mueller was a blockade. How, in your book, does that make Mueller a white hat. See pic. ANYONE saying Mueller is white hat is pushing disinfo. Are you going to be a disinfo pusher???

It needs to be remmoved from notes or do a disservice to Q.

>>6633957

Q laid the debate to rest. Re-read drops.

>>6633972

You're wrong and just pushing disinfo. Mueller could very well have been Dir if Congress approved it.

>>6633984

You are doing a disservice to Q and QR by adding this…

>>6633251 , >>6633284, >>6633883, >>6633950 (You) Is Mueller working for POTUS? Analysis for and against

I've shown you the drop where Q was very specific on Mueller. Yet you still include that fake news Mueller is white hat. Shameful.

>>6633981

>You don't get that ALL Q's posts may be disinfo?

Are you really trying to say that every single Q post is disinfo? Really?!? Then wtf are we doing here anyway? If we can't use logic and trust somethings Q said, then this whole board is nothing but a psyop. Is that what you are really trying to say?

Do you really wonder why anons don't always have baker's backs?