dChan
Anonymous ID: 5fd26b May 30, 2019, 9:14 p.m. No.6634120   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4140 >>4148 >>4158 >>4165 >>4225 >>4279 >>4284 >>4376

>>6634107

Go back to reddit.

>fuck off disinfo shill

>Wait until you are attacked by bo/bv's

Mueller exonerated POTUS after meeting with him the day before he was appointed.

Mueller was dirty from his time in the FBI and was used as a blockade.

Anyone claiming Mueller is a white hat is misinformed; yet, anyone saying he is a total black hat is also misinformed.

Q was PERFECTLY ambiguous about this in the crumbs if you've gone through all of them about Mueller.

The most descriptive "hat" to call Mueller would be a Grey Hat, both white and black at certain times.

The fact is ultimately Mueller exonerated POTUS but is dirty.

Mueller is now getting the Sessions treatment from POTUS FOR OPTICS.

Reread crumbs and old breads

This has been discussed on /pol/ and all the boards leading to /qresearch/ since Mueller was appointed. You're essentially stuck in your view point by now anyway.

>>6634079

>>6634088

thank you bakers

Anonymous ID: 5fd26b May 30, 2019, 9:22 p.m. No.6634187   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4214

>>6634148

>>6634165

>>6634168

I don't really care to be honest, I'm just stating my opinion from what I've noticed since Mueller was appointed. He's done anyway.

>Nobody exonerates anybody, except if you are a Catholic and go to a Priest.

Why did POTUS say Mueller exonerated him many times?

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1109918388133023744

>>6634158

Probably.

We spent 700 billion on the military. 40 million for an investigation that finds no collusion is nothing in the government, which is horrible.

Anonymous ID: 5fd26b May 30, 2019, 9:34 p.m. No.6634288   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4297

>>6634265

It was not supposed to be revealed POTUS is not under criminal investigation _ NOT YET.

Traitor.

Massive intel sweep.

Manafort was a plant.

Trace background.

Open source.

Who was arrested?

Non US.

Trace background.

Open source.

Carter Page was a plant.

Trace background.

Open source.

Why is Mueller going after 'inside plants'?

Flynn is safe.

Define 'witness'.

Can a 'witness' hold a position of power/influence while ongoing?

Anonymous ID: 5fd26b May 30, 2019, 9:46 p.m. No.6634376   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4396

>>6634334

Then anon, respectfully, I'm trying to not push disinfo I'm trying to explain my point of view.

Q presented TWO sides of Mueller. I'm trying to convey that. The crumbs from 2017 and half the 2018 present a different side of Mueller than the crumbs from the other half of 2018 and 2019.

reread my post: >>6634120

>Anyone claiming Mueller is a white hat is misinformed; yet, anyone saying he is a total black hat is also misinformed.

I am NOT and I've never said Mueller is a white hat.

He is dirty as fuck. He was USED by both sides it seems from my observations.

That's what I'm trying to say, search my other posts if you'd like to.

MUELLER. IS. NOT. A. WHITE. HAT.

Can't be much clearer than that.

I swear I've had this discussion countless times.

>>6634351

Anonymous ID: 5fd26b May 30, 2019, 9:48 p.m. No.6634398   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6634353

>If you wanted to have a discussion, you could have left out the insults,

>first post

>fuck off disinfo shill. Q warned anons about faggots like you.

>muh bakers

yea ok

Anonymous ID: 5fd26b May 30, 2019, 9:50 p.m. No.6634406   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4464

>>6634396

I agree the discussion is good.

I also personally think putting but sides of the discussion is a good thing.

But that's just me, your opinion is valid, I see it as the baker representing both sides.

Thanks for the discussion anon.

>>6634386

HAHAHA