>>6633971 pb
there is no one
and i mean no one
who knows more about being full of crap
(((this platform was chosen for a reason)))
you got me there.
i wonder if there could maybe, just maybe, be more than 1 plot twist remaining?
all he has to do is ask
what a bone to throw the lefties, a dead mockingbird bone. hey, an anon can hope. and watch. and trust the plan until last.
or not. i volunteered for this abuse. nightly and daily for months on end.
i can quit any time. really i can. quitting is easy, i've done it dozens of times.
i know, i know, fkn sauce it
speaking of Ukrainian leaks and Victoria Nuland. oh yeah, no buddy is.
'specially [very 'specially] at goonooz
the no leaks guy
fuck. 3 times. did it afkngenn
superior digits. ty o7
slate's article on fark face from 2017. coupla things:
assistant sec def for Russia Ukraine and EURASIA not making it Orwellian at all
Asst. Sec Def. . . parse that repeatedly plz.
"Obama administration officials working to preserve and disseminate intelligence" reclassification downgrade to 'secret' from 'top secret'
and disseminate means what you think it means.
Vannity and THE LOUD ONE were 'all over this' according to slate over two years ago, so why are they not covering Simpson @ Aspen with Hannigan Farkas and Schiff?
throw in Biden NABU the black ledger and Manafort
and continue to parse that repeatedly plz
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2017/03/who-the-hell-is-evelyn-farkas.html
For the past few days, a wide range of conservative media outlets have been losing their stuff over the apparent revelations of an interview that aired nearly a month ago with a former Obama official named Evelyn Farkas. A clip of the interview titled “Obama Aide Evelyn Farkas Squeals Live On MSNBC: ‘I Helped Spy On Trump For Obama’(VIDEO)!!!” has been viewed on YouTube more than 300,000 times. During Friday’s press briefing, White House press secretary Sean Spicer referenced Farkas by name: “I think that the revelations of Evelyn Farkas —who played a senior role in the Obama administration —going on the record to talk about how they politically used classified information is troubling.” Wait, though: Who the hell is Eveyln Farkas?
Let’s start from the beginning. Early this month, the New York Times published a story about Obama administration officials working to preserve and disseminate intelligence about Russian efforts to influence November’s election across the government before President Obama left office. According to the article, officials were concerned that some of that intelligence, including intercepted communications from Russians detailing contacts with people in Trump’s circle and information on Russian meetings with Trump associates, would be “covered up or destroyed” by the Trump administration.
The day after the story was published, MSNBC analyst and former Obama Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Russia and Ukraine, Evelyn Farkas appeared on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” and was asked about the article. Farkas, who left the Obama administration in 2015, told Mika Brzezinski that she had encouraged former colleagues still working in the administration and “people on the Hill” to take part in the effort to preserve intelligence and intelligence sources:
I was urging my former colleagues and frankly speaking the people on the Hill—it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people—get as much information as you can, get as much intelligence as you can before President Obama leaves the administration. Because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior people who left. So it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy that the Trump folks—if they found out how we knew what we knew about the Trump staff, dealing with Russians—that they would try to compromise those sources and methods, meaning we would no longer have access to that intelligence.
read the rest at the link