This is to set congress up.
The reason why those individuals are not being charged with treason is because of precedent, and because of the requirements for a successful treason conviction.
This is bait. This interview was about making sure all the traps are full.
Once that happens the treason trials will start for HRC, Brennan, and BarryO.
Maybe a few others too, but the smaller fish will not get treason charges. They will continue to resign and be convicted for lesser crimes. In exchange for testimony.
>It doesn't necessarily mean … you know, that people have crossed lines have done so with corrupt intent or anything like that.
This is because those smaller fish will be providing evidence and whistleblowing, or they get a military tribunal.
I think that's the choice these bad actors have been getting:
You either tell us what you know, and get disgraced and here's your script and whatever happens to you in civilian land happns but it keeps you alive…
Or you get disgraced anyway and get a mil tribunal as an enemy combatant of the State.
''Because once you are stripped of your citizenship and/or are given enemy copmbatant status under the patriot/mil appropriations/ndaa acts, you do not enjoy constitutional protections.''
No need to charge anyone with treason, unless they fit the textbook definition of treason.