Anonymous ID: 17fa12 May 31, 2019, 8:42 a.m. No.6636800   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6805

>>6636778

I guess the women’s choice narrative isn’t working anymore, have to shift it to i can’t work without abortions.

But yes, let’s blame the people and legislatures of Georgia for people losing their jobs, not the production companies pushing an agenda.

Fucking sickos

Anonymous ID: 17fa12 May 31, 2019, 8:55 a.m. No.6636869   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6940

>>6636834

I believe it was Theresa May that had an adopted Pastor father who was involved or related to several scandals in the UK. Kinda spoopy background.

Didn’t dig into Merkels background. Curious how they met to have photos taken together when young. Also they were taken around same time Merkel was involved in her communist/nazi/ whatever background (purely speculation based upon ages of each in related photos)

Anonymous ID: 17fa12 May 31, 2019, 9:07 a.m. No.6636932   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>6636902

https://www.christiantoday.com/article/exclusive-prime-minister-to-meet-pope-francis-sooner-rather-than-later/104495.htm

>article from feb 2017

 

The pope never met with May despite a meeting being planned. Last time they met was in 2014 and some of the topics discussed included human trafficking.

 

I don’t take that sentence as being about a date. More about a person, and I think May didn’t do what the pope wanted.

 

Just my take on the matter

Anonymous ID: 17fa12 May 31, 2019, 9:14 a.m. No.6636972   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>6636940

there was a soft hit piece written about him, essentially a biography used to explain away his connections to the church sex scandals where he was located.

 

I don’t have the article anymore, but he was in two locations that had serious sexual abuse happening and he escaped conviction of being involved. Article made it seem like he was oblivious. I took it as he was being politically and legally protected, maybe because of his adopted daughter.

Anonymous ID: 17fa12 May 31, 2019, 9:20 a.m. No.6637010   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>7053

>>6636987

That’s an interesting take on that despite Bill Barr saying Huber was investigating HRC and it was nearly done.

Sharing a workload - Horowitz took over FISA abuse, Huber the CF and HRC issues. Notice how all these articles fail to highlight that difference when they screech about how how Huber didn’t question anyone about FISA? And how articles have screeched about Horowitz not questioning anyone about HRC, the emails, or CF?

It’s misdirection. Not lies, but not exactly the truth either.

Not going to get worked up about it