/facepalm
Read really carefully:
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 2d9344 No.5837376 📁
Mar 22 2019 21:42:48 (EST)
[They] thought it was coming last Friday.
Ammunition spent.
Q
Ammunition spent.
^^^^^^^^^^^
They, as in the subject of the previous sentence being UFOs, as in:
Where are they [THE UFOS] coming from and what is the technology behind these devices that we are observing?
Yep, because that's the current distraction.
If Tucker does the special on OTHER WORLD LIFE FORMS and WHY THEY WANT TO SERVE MAN then I'd be inclined to watch it. But it's about UFOs, and people, like the other anon I just responded to, will read into whatever statements are being made, ABOUT THE UFOs, and extrapolate that they are talking about ALIUMS.
That's exactly how I'm reading it. I can build a UFO in my backyard right now. Gyro-copters do not require a license. If I fly that to a nearby airport, they may report a "UFO" in the area, until it's later identified as a Gyro-copter. At which time, it will no longer be a UFO.
There are military-grade aircraft that are, and will indefinitely remain, unidentifiable. Hence the term:
U-F-O.
Go ahead and watch Tucker. It'll be interesting to see how they twist the words to present the plausibility of extraterrestrial life being the pilots and and engineers behind these "things" that "don't behave like anything we could possibly have the technology for", despite the fact that anons know there's tons of secret tech out there, and UFOs are just a portion of that realm of possibilities.
>Next week
K. In the meantime, anyone/everyone in Hollywood, especially this "elite" talking about the unwritten "code" was, at some point in time, in on it as well.
These Hollywoodanons need to get some points on the board.