>>6638280

>>6637978

Hey baker, for the wearethene.ws notable, here are some screenshots!

Love the website and the idea behind it!

Thanks!

>>6638321

>muh gateway pundit

Did you read anything else besides that shitty source?

Past bread notables:

>>6636943, >>6636971 William Barr dishes on what Huber, Horowitz, and Durham are investigating

https://wearethene.ws/notable/50451

"The other issues he’s been working on relate to Hillary Clinton. Those are winding down and hopefully we’ll be in a position to bring those to fruition."

>>6638346

Q doesn't "confirm" websites anon.

qanon.news is a great site and I don't Q has ever mentioned it.

Q used qanon.pub several times and I think qmap.pub a few times maybe (not sure).

It's just a way to easily see notables and from what I've seen it works well.

Just another tool/resource.

>>6638357

So she's delusional?

We already knew that.

This is accurate: >>6638362

>>6638319

>>6638336

I still view this from the military as literally unidentified flying objects.

I am really interested to see what they reveal or find though.

>>6638331

Honestly anon, read it and think for yourself.

>>6638422

EXACTLY!

I think Tucker does a fair job with them, he asked about the speed, dynamics, physics, and stuff like that.

Of course the alien connection is plausible, but looking at this realistically is the best way to go.

>>6638448

>Inter-dimensional fallen angels

that sounds really scary

>>6638249

>>6638299

Also, relevant graphics, side by sides, SOME discussion/theories, and especially digs are notable imo.

Not just pure news.

o7

>>6638462

>You are the news now

WE are the news now!

And I understand, just think for yourself.

I personally like the website to read notables.

>>6638534

I agree, and that sucks anon.

How your site is all good!

>>6638537

>>6638521

you can add if you want, got to go now

just posted pics for context on the notable on the notable website:

>>6638317

thanks baker!

>>6638564

Thank the anon who made it who I think is 43486d based on the announcement

I just like it and use it too!

>>6638583

>>6638586

oh and if you want to add this little addition to the nomination post it might add context. fast bread so will format for you if youwant to use it

have a nice day baker!

>>6638249, >>6638463 How to nominate a nobable to help QResearch bakers

>>6638602

used this method: >>6638249

and it's from march

possibly good for a reminder baker

>>6638593

>>6638611

>>6638623

BAKER, it says nobable, SHOULD BE NOTABLE

kek

>>6638642

just change the spelling for the notables post and repost the dough later or something, thanks!