LIVE TOMORROW @5PM PACIFIC

AND REMEMBER: VOTE PEPE IN 2020.

Leave your shekels at home and bring your freedom!

VOTE 4 PEPE IN 2020

>>6638723

Yeah sure.

Handoff confirmed?

>>6638751

Exactly Anon. Anjel would totally devour Obama's legacy. This is why, like you said, we should VOTE PEPE IN 2020.

o7

>>6638759

You can see my baking here Anon. Very based and Patriotic baking IMO.

>>6638813

Agreed Anon…

Attachment to the material, is detachment from the spiritual.

Don't forget to join me LIVE Saturday Night @5pm Pacific, 8pm Eastern. It's gonna be super dope! We will ask questions that need answers.

We are the news now. Kek.

>>6638847

>>6638888

You know, there is a solution to this…

They think it's a joke but if we need an outsider to do what Trump & Q promised, he is here.

People want freedom, not a circus show.

PEPE WILL FREE EVERYONE

>>6638921

Anon, you are so on point!

Pepe in 2020 is the only way.

>>6638933

Kek 😂

Funniest shit I've seen all week.

What goes up, must come down.

>>6639148

Kek you don't have social media? Then how are you helping the cause?

Ironic that PEPE begins 2020 campaign this morning, then POTUS Tweets hours later about 2020 announcement?

Coincidence?

Here's a Q:

Why hasn't POTUS made an executive order which makes social media censorship and filtering ILLEGAL?

Don't get all bent out of shape, just answer the question.

>>6639256

>>6639264

Wait, so censorship is lawful?

Is the IRS a regulation on American citizens?

Why does POTUS allow that?

Hillary committed over $2.5million worth of tax fraud, and the IRS did nothing. And regular civilians should be perfectly fine with that?

I can do this all day.

>>6639275

Giving REAL CIVILIANS freedom of speech and the right to not be censored or filtered would be a dictatorship?

Yeah I can tell you're not a regular civilian.

The dictators know that with TRUE freedom of speech, their RULE ends.

And that's what POTUS is protecting, THEIR RULE.

Any candidate who ran on abolishing the IRS, ENDING THE FED, AND OUTLAWING SOCIAL MEDIA CENSORSHIP would destroy ANY candidate not willing to do the same in the upcoming election. Even Trump. You can't beat true freedom, YOU KNOW IT, I KNOW AND DONALD KNOWS IT.

>>6639352

Funny, I have never heard anyone say "social media publisher."

I call bullshit.

And here's another Q:

If YouTube really was against POTUS, why wouldn't they filter White House videos? They don't hesitate to filter an actual civilian's YouTube.

>>6639388

Tell me Anon, how does that benefit your anything in your life?