Can I say that if you go that route I'll be sure you are merely a larper-fagging-on.
I can think the actor is 'super' meanwhile the character they play is a sot.
even if a narrative is false, or fiction, there are still truths revealed with in it.
if you see the narratives you craft now in 20 years, will you be proud of the stories you shared?
I hate to say it but even though the last clause of your statement started with 'typical' which usually riles me by being generalized, I quickly said "let me post and confirm that, yes, it's very typical of leftist ideolougues in some camps to dispose of people after having used them brutally.
if they aren't like that they stop being leftists by say, 25.
I haven't seen a 'look at it, Chuck' meme in a long time. That's a brutal one!
meme-tastic!
ok, please, I'm not wanting any shit for this but it's actually funny, and wsa running through my mind earlier:
he invented
muh jew shill and Syria-jew
they don't list you if they don't like you.
I would go the route of saying that the service was falsely advertised and get them on Commerce and SEC violations: violation of the 'contract' by advertising it as 'search' when, in fact, it was something else.
If Facebook is a 'digital town square', as they say, then it needed to be treated as such by them, but they didn't. And they have argued that in court that 'Facebook is a digital town square.' Thus we can say that they have violated our right to Free Speech and also our right to Free Assembly in the 'Town Square' that they hosted.
https://www.dailydot.com/debug/facebook-lawyer-no-expectation-of-privacy/