Re: Stephen Hawking ~

I'm half convinced HE wasn't in charge of the voice emanating from his computer.

The responses seemed too fast for someone using an (unknown) device in his cheek??!! to select words. Shouldn't there be a delay between word selections? How many choices of words can he really have that sentences come together so well with no pauses while choosing the next word?

He's not just saying "juice, please" or "good morning". He would roll off long sentences with uncommon words with ease. A feat I've not seen in any other quadrapeligic. What is this amazing device?

Also his death on Einstein's birthday coupled with his birth (obviously random) 300 years to the day from Galileo may have been chosen to solidify/mystify his existance such that his opinions hold more gravitas post mortem.

>>> "He" has been shilling for the NWO the last 10 years after all

Anyone else think he might have been commandeered? Maybe even offed on Pi Day/Einstein's bday by design? He could have been failing so "they" chose 3/14 to unhook him.

Thoughts?

>>664265

Thanks bra(h) ; ;

>>664289

Hawking's speech was as fluid as people NOT using some device in their cheek to select words. Seems like certain words would have to be spelled & if not, just how many words could be available with one mouth move to create such flowing speech?

It just seems impossible to me. There would HAVE TO BE some pauses as he spelled or clicked & clicked to arrive at some more obscure terminology (which he used often).

Meanwhile, I know of no other quadrapeligic that uses a similar device. Surely some others would want the technology to express themselves.

If anyone knows of another quadrapeligic that uses a similar device, please fill me in.

Nature made me inquisitive, life made me skeptical. So be it!!