>>6641716 LB LB
agreed
seems he was contradicting POTUS saying publicly that treason did not occur
he should have said I dunno wait for the evidence
as much as i hate to say it perhaps the plan is stalled
i have seen no offense yet
POTUS is magnificent but has not made a dent on the corrupt system (yet - hope springs eternal)
Hannity Special Interrupted Edition
oh the irony…………
>Center for Global Policy Solutions
here are ALL the IRS forms
http://990finder.foundationcenter.org/990results.aspx?990_type=&fn=Center+for+Global+Policy+Solutions&st=&zp=&ei=&fy=&action=Search
anons DIG this site wow
NOTABLE VERY VERY NOTABLE DIG TOOL
http://foundationcenter.org/find-funding/990-finder
>expose Mueller's report as a "fraud
well that will be a boom
never habbened before
9-11
jfk
etc etc etc
this is what the constitution and federal law provide: (note the word OR)
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
lawfag here
if BARR comes out and says a declared war is required then i will NEVER trust him again
he didnt say that
he was referring (IMO) to intent
sloppy though
you lack a 40k view of the bible anon
cuz you assume that all people who love the bible are stupid biblefags who believe what the church teaches and what saul wrote
that is an extreme error
> treason will be a hard standard to hold them to lawfully
that is what he SHOULD have said
that begs the question
declared war is NOT a requirement for a treason charge
that is a slide