dChan
Anonymous ID: 1bf45f June 1, 2019, 2:09 a.m. No.6643939   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3946 >>3998

>>6643917 USAspending.gov is partially down for me r/n, but here is some 10,000 ft. viewing for FireEye ($130M) and Mandiant ($25M). Once the entire site is available to me, I'll do some more poking around and look at recipient profiles for all FY. IIRC, this overview is just the $ for the trailing 12 months and is not an all FY accounting of their gov. contracts.

 

https://www.usaspending.gov/#/keyword_search/%22FireEye%22

https://www.usaspending.gov/#/keyword_search/%22Mandiant%22

Anonymous ID: 1bf45f June 1, 2019, 2:40 a.m. No.6643983   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6643917 Was able to get recipient profile on Mandiant for all FYs. Interesting graph in terms of ramping up of spending in certain years AND that the top gov. sub agency was the FBI.

 

https://www.usaspending.gov/#/recipient/19c09e2d-d602-b66c-4b17-94ec05a4513e-C

Anonymous ID: 1bf45f June 1, 2019, 3:15 a.m. No.6644050   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4054

Posted this yesterday, did some editing, and reposting today. Bakers try to go through this process for every single notable that makes it into a bake. 751 Posts. Let that sink in for a moment. Bakers aren't supposed to be secretaries, editors and instant headline writers. Give them some help anons. To those of you who have embraced this process - Thank You Patriots!

 

How to Nominate a Notable and Help Your Bakers

  1. Have you checked to see if your nom has already been notabled? Handy tool: https://qresear.ch/

Be sure to scroll down the page. Your search terms will appear in red.

  1. Does your nom have a working link? If there is no link, there is no notable.

  2. Does the link work? Did you open it? If the link is broken or doesn't work, there is no notable.

  3. IF you want to nominate something older, use the date:'From 2018' or 'reminder' in your description

  4. If your notable is a graphic, chart or side by side it still needs a description re: Why it is notable

  5. Some discussions are notable - inclusion of discussions as notable is up to the Baker.

  6. Relevant Digs with sourced information and live links are definitely notable.

 

Doing It

  1. Start a new reply

  2. Line 1 of your notable - Baker Notable or if you prefer, use red text

  3. Line 2 of your notable - tag the post you're nominating and Include a short Why It Is Notable statement on the same line with a space between

the tag and your statement. (Should look like a single line in the notables section of the bread)

"Notable AF" does not count as a 'why it is notable' statement and neither does ^^^^^^.

That's it. Sounds easy, is easy.

 

So why doesn't everyone do it?