I took this from the transcripts of the Barr / Crawford interview, thought it was interesting:

WILLIAM BARR: Well it's hard to read some of the texts with and not feel that there was gross bias at work and they're appalling. And if the shoe were on the other–

JAN CRAWFORD: Appalling.

WILLIAM BARR: Those were appalling. And on their face they were very damning and I think if the shoe was on the other foot we could be hearing a lot about it. If those kinds of discussions were held you know when Obama first ran for office, people talking about Obama in those tones and suggesting that "Oh that he might be a Manchurian candidate for Islam or something like that." You know some wild accusations like that and you had that kind of discussion back and forth, you don't think we would be hearing a lot more about it?

>>6644422

Here's the sauce:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/william-barr-interview-full-transcript-cbs-this-morning-jan-crawford-exclusive-2019-05-31/

>>6644499

Hey Baker, you put the transcript in the notables…but Barr making the below statement is interesting!

>people talking about Obama in those tones and suggesting that "Oh that he might be a Manchurian candidate for Islam or something like that."