only 12 hours till the exciting fame fag pod cast!
woo hoo.
he's our favorite manic, and a good looking man.
I think it's partly a larp.
Love the larper, hate the larp.
Though he is always shown with them, and often trashed, I've felt thta it was a 'crazy ex-girlfriend' part of his life . . . when he was with Abbideen.
but he does seem to be connected on the inside to the Chicago gang. And that made him a clownish asset.
and he as to be a villain here or else the Asian overlords might think that he's on our side. Even if he isn't that puts him in harms way, and even if you don't like him, at least you can agree that there have been no real allegations against him except for guilt by association.
And that he's a tool to fans, a very lot of people say. But that might be attributed to general surrliness and a penchant for privacy. For example in Hollywood/LA people mostly leave 'the famous' alone. and so if he's in Chicago he might expect that but that's not how it works in Chicago at a ball game.
Any way I've felt that he is probably a free thinking person, seems rather clownish, and he's obviously an asset for being smart enough to write essays about important issues, and he is vocal for free speech and civil respect issues.
in hind sight it was always clownish and curious people who would say that they 'lovveeed' J. Cussack. Maybe they knew him from 'the farm'?
I have to say he does seem to be someone's asset.
how can you be an infiltrator and a double agent if you dn't at least pretend to be 'one of them'?
I don't think we should be throwing him under the bus (a metaphor for trying to smeer him).
My guess is that he's complex and not easy to untangle. He is who he is by an accident of unfortunate association (Jeremy the lothario pivin and he were bst buds once).
but how can you be a fav in holly wood for teen movies if you aren't connected? or putting out?
These are questions I don't really need answers to.
seems pretty much that he's either a clown or we are supposed to think that he's a clown . . . like I said in another post:
"I have to say he does seem to be someone's asset."
but is he a bad clown?
I also suggest 'double agent'
I also like to 'think for myself' and Barlow, though very contriversial, never seemed like a bad person to me.
In fact he's too complex to sum up in a small shit post. so . . .
I'll leave upon skepticism about Cussack too.
I'm not a fan of 'guilt by association'.
no
benifit of the doubt.
prudent
I am always a skeptic to charges of 'treason'.
I will play that role for someone who is too sure without real evidence that another is 'treasonous' or 'bad'.