>>6646402

"getting the band back together" sounds a lot like "Blues Brothers"…

And yes, Q told us early that Mueller didn't investigate Trump.

He investigated the plot against Trump.

Because the first time, when Barr told the public that Mueller used a wording that Mueller could not conclude that Trump is not guilty, this was done to bait the Dems into impeaching Trump.

It didn't work: The Dems talked a lot, but didn't go for impeachment.

Second try:

Mueller himself reported on his report, weirdly saying again that he couldn't find evidence that Trump is NOT guilty.

BAIT!

Trump wants to be impeached.

It would destroy the Dems.

And Trump could use a lot of evidenced gathered in ways that do not allow this evidence to be brought before court normally.

BUT:

If you are indicted of something, you have the right to defnd yourself with EVERYTHING YOU HAVE!

>>6646531

Yes, same thing.

"How do you introduce evidence?", Q asked.

By letting yourself be indicted.

THEN you can use everything(!) you have, to defend yourself.

This is the reason, why Trump wants to be impeached.

And Barr, Mueller and maybe even Comey now are baiting the Dems to do this.

Question is: If Dems see the trap and refuse to impeach,

what is Plan B then?

>>6646629

Maybe the Q is not as important than the next tweet with the "missing Q".

Trumps LGBT-tweet today had also missing the Q.

Now we have both Trump and Comey tweeting something with a missing Q.

>>6646656

We all assume that Comey is bad.

And maybe he is.

But we should bear in mind that Q told us that we're watching a movie.

A lot of actors…actors playing bad persons don't have to be bad persons in real life…

We'll know someday…

>>6646719

Interesting!

>>6646910

The only thing they have left, is to mock AG Barr for his clothes.

Sounds like our side is winning.

>>6646989

>the "everyone dies" comment is the real meat and potatoes.

And it also might have shocked them, because "everyone dies" could also foreshadow the fate of the traitors.