When I read that Lübcke told German citizens, opposing Merkel's mass immigration politics, that they could leave the country, I thought that there might be indeed some cosmic justice.
How can a "conservative" politician tell his voters(!) something this outrageous!
Whoever killed him is a criminal, but this man was scum.
Google "Lübcke erschossen".
You'll find many articles claiming that he was shot!
Nobody claimed suicide hours ago, all articles said he was shot.
Don't hit me, only because I'm mentioning that ETS said several times that RBG is "on ice".
Q told us that she is barely alive, that she gets off market drugs to keep her alive.
Maybe you keep someone cooler than normal, to uphold bodily functions longer….on ice…didn't someone tweet today about the Mayo Clinic and board of directors?
What if Mayo not only treated Noname, but also RBG?
Prolonging her life by having her "on ice"/ "cold".
If she did die now, she would be "frozen".
Maybe all these weird tweets were comms, where they informed each other that RBG is dead now…
https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=l%C3%BCbcke+erschossen&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
Yes, and isn't it weird that a Regierungspräsident is reportedly shot dead and all the big papers are silent and do not even report that he is dead?
An important figure head of the CDU shot dead and MSM does not report anything?
Oder "nur von lokalem Interesse"?
>Do you think the whole SC is complicit?
Excellent argument.
But do you really believe that Q told us that RBG is barely alive and suddenly she is up and kicking again?
And I don't know, why nobody is asking or telling re: RBG.
But something is sure:
When Q told us that she is barely alive, asking us, who's treating her (my guess: Mayo Clinic), how on earth could she then AGAIN be fit enough to do her job?
Something is very fishy here and I assume that everybody kept quiet and waited.
Boring reply and unsolicitated and unnessecary:
This is NOT about ETS, this is about RBG on ice, cold, frozen.
Don't read ETS, if you don't like what he writes.
But don't tell other people what to read and think.
When I did this three hours ago, there were only two papers "Fuldaer" and "Morgenpost". Only two!
You are too dumb to understand what I wrote:
THIS IS NOT ABOUT ETS.
This is about people like you.
Telling other people what to do, what to think.
STOP THAT.
Nobody cares about your intentions to tell other people what to do.
Who do you think you are?
Other people's parent? Schoolmarm?
Or are you a Leftie by DNA?
If I'd want to be lectured by idiotic people, I'd ask them!
Just read the article on "Welt".
Small article, nothing of interest, only 12 comments.
Looks to me, like they want to sweep it under the rug.
>The majority of German sheeple wouldn't even notice :/
True.
"Fuldaer" wrote that he was found in the garden and "Morgenpost" wrote that he was found in the house.
Even the "quality journalists" don't care about their facts.
>Q did it to [James Woods} too. James also quickly deleted it.
Proof?
And next question:
Why would James Woods delete a Q?
>If ETS said it,
>it's BULLSHIT you dumb motherfucker.
This is what I meant:
You are exactly the pompous, ridiculous, asshole, never having any clue of how utterly dumb you are .
But you have the urge to tell other people what to do.
On the other hand:
Who cares?
How hard is it to understand that this is not about ETS?
This is about people telling other people what to think.
Like you.
>and nobody here will take you serious
Idc, if anonymous pompous assholes take me serious.
I'm every week in notables, doing my thing for qresearch, thinking independently, I DON'T CARE; IF YOU TAKE ME SERIOUS:
Let that think in!
I never cared and I never will.
You mean nothing to me.
The only thing I care about here is qresearch, research, and Q.
And I brought a lot to the table.
Hopefully you do this too, when not thoughtpolicing other people.
Yes.