Thank you and please do. I may step away to eat soon but will return.
Yes, but if you pay attention it will be obvious who they are in the next thread.
They also (intentionally?) respond to previous breads.
It's not hard to follow and worth the read.
Thank you for the feedback.
The "His story" part was included because a very wise anon the other night pointed that out.
The intention behind the winners write the history books part was I felt it is something people already hold a true and logical statement.
I will consider an alternative approach.
Also my intentions were not on imitate Q or imply any direct association with Q.
The Socratic method is used for a reason.
When considering how to best share what I have been discovering, it seemed to make the most sense.
Again, the feedback you provided is good and will be strongly considered. It really will.
The current intended audience is fellow anons. To have them correct or confirm.
Thank you.
I did not intentionally copy anyone, but if you were one of the wise anons from the other night, you very much deserve credit, and I thank you again for your assistance and guidance.
I'm just seeking the truth and it's connections to Q's posts.
Also if you have anything I should add to the post or anything I should further dig on, that's related, please let me know.
WWG1WGA
I've already dug. Almost everything can be quickly confirmed via wikipedia.
My intentions were to help connect the dots into a larger picture.
And to ask rather than tell.
Also to get feedback and if I had anything wrong.
Oh and by "in progress" I meant that I am still collecting info and altering which questions should be in there and in which order, to best communicate what I am attempting to communicate.