>>665625

Not a massive fan of us making our own Q style posts, but if you are gonna do it definitely drop that 'is history "his story"' line. Just gonna make people roll their eyes and move on. Also if you say winners write the history books a bunch of redditards are gonna jump onto that point and tell you scholars actually wrote it down.

>>666046

Lol WE WUZ PREZIDENTS AND SHEEEIT being posted unironically on a chan, I've seen it all. Please leave

>>666197

The winners write the history books thing is a pretty cool quote, just letting you know that on reddit and shit people love to 'Well Ackhyually' anyone who posts it. Problem with the 'his story' thing is it's the kinda thing people would have seen before shared on Facebook by their kooky conspiracy friend or whatever and I don't think it will resonate very well with them

>>666225

criticism doesn't make people a shill you fool anything can be improved on. The 'His Story' line is cringy and the kind of thing you'll see where people will reply 'I'm 14 and this is deep' mocking it

>>666211

There's a difference between having a limited belief system and believing every blurry jpeg. You're so stupid that I genuinely hope I'm being trolled by a shill.

>>666261

Changing one cringy line does not change the truth you sperg. It makes it more likely to actually redpill anyone

>>666268

Please go and post that picture of African Abraham Lincoln on /pol/ and you'll see that it doesn't need to be AI to think you're a low IQ moron. even the most red pilled people will laugh in your face

>>666285

These people have ruined this board though lol, look at the lack of any research been done in the last few days. All the youtubers covering this shit have brought their retarded 50 year old viewers along with them

>>666299

So it's not 'his story' then? Either way it's not gonna be effective at making people do anything other than groan