>>664777
Response broken down into two parts here:
Part 1:
>Events like spirit cooking dinners all meant to weed out the unblackmailable.
In a way, Ronald Bernard (the dutch banker who apparently managed to get out of the 'system') was speaking exactly about this. He was weeded out. Confirmed?
Your previous post regarding blackmailability of individuals in 'power' is noted, good clue to follow up on. In line with Q drops and messages. Will follow.
>>664693
>When you look at the news, try to look for data "empowering" people, what specific behavior is encouraged.
They are encouraged to aggress against existing host system, its people. They are encouraged to behave in criminal, invading fashion. General lower tier mediums such as 'entertainment' all encourage such behavior as 'masculine' 'alpha' while denigrating any peaceable attitudes as 'uncle tom' 'bitch made nigga' 'weak' etc.
Fertile grounds with many underlying elements (being a minority in a nation/group, perceived or real 'oppressions'). Conditions ideal for agitation and devolution.
>Why would a certain population be encouraged to do things that keep them poor?
Lack of independence/under economic, psychological, mental, social duress = essentially under political/personal blackmail. Can't see forest from trees if they are about to be killed/starving/raped and/or full of false bullshit empowerment and artificially generation/nurtured attitude.
As the devolved monkey may exclaim, Need that mullah, yo!
Applies to all segments and 'groups' not just racial classes but also 'generations' and 'have vs have not' of all kinds etc. Gameplay same, different details.
>When people are poor, they go for low hanging fruit.
'they' meaning the manipulators? Or the criminals themselves in lower class who victimize helpless and vulnerable? Rotherham is an example of this.
If first scenario:
Bill clinton and hillary come to mind, not to mention all the 'spittin hawt fyia' rappers and 'entertainers'.
Infinitely blackmailable, great deal of leverage. Be it poor kid in trailer in AK, ugly brunette with little talent in AK backwaters, or poor black boy last of his siblings in a broken home.
Burning desire to advance, ignoring and wanting to forget weakness.
FEAR.
Michael Jackson a successful prototype for subsequent negro 'models' designed to devolve a population?
I am intimately familiar to a degree with this environment. It is hell. They are all being raped, and like groomed, enslaved women, they rejoice in it.
Disgusting and enraging are the most diplomatic terms I can use.
>We all, in a sense, work to reduce other people's price. The news is a vast, weaponized, attempt on the population to do this.
So that each of us can surpass one another. 'monkey brain' and impulse are irresistible for many. MSM and most funded news medium, especially those 'alternative' mediums, are designed to cater to, reflect, and assuage the 'beautiful lies' of each target segment, make them more pliable towards certain dispositions and offers).
Ever since the advent of mass media, devolution of human consciousness has been accelerating at the near geometric pace. Real time manipulation, engineering, molding.
>When you know social engineering strategy, you will realize all news is essentially made out of it.
See above. Best thing for ((harvesters))? As you have stated, it is done by FREE CHOICE. ((your bloodline)) ALWAYS gets its 'cut'.
HARVEST.
FREE WILL. To oppress. To subvert. To lie. To deceive. To violate. To 'rule'.
Starting to see the bigger picture.
From our previous correspondence:
>>642715
>You are looking at agendas and seeing it's a negative to you, and then coming up with a because. They are doing this because.
They are trying to incite a certain reactions from their targets, ie us. The said reaction is obvious and predictable, and at the current state the West is in, ineffective and actually works to demoralize us even further (killing itself). Conditions were created to faciliate this (weaken of male role, general softness etc). Media used heavily. Years of demoralizing propaganda.
>When you come up with the because, think in terms of a systemic affect, rather than a simple "because they hate us" type of thing.
Above mechanisms have the systemic effect of taking away prominence/alpha status of a target nation's peoples, weakening the existing 'rivial' political and cultural power, thus enabling intruders and their masters (manipulators) to gain full uncontested control. Centralization of power, no more independent entities that can be an obstacle to total domination and ((slavery)).
Note I am using two parentheses instead of usual three. My way of signifying difference.
cont...